Houston Johannus

Houston Johannus is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and sentencing. Their track record shows a 80.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Houston Johannus has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	5 cases	17% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Houston Johannus has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	4 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Houston Johannus has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Houston Johannus has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Houston Johannus has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Houston Johannus has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Houston Johannus has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Grievous Hurt	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Houston Johannus has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Houston Johannus has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Rioting	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Houston Johannus has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Employment of Foreign Manpower Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Houston Johannus has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Murder	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Houston Johannus has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Houston Johannus has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Houston Johannus has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Houston Johannus has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Road Rage	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Houston Johannus has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appellate Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Houston Johannus has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Houston Johannus has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Houston Johannus has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Houston Johannus has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Houston Johannus has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Houston Johannus has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	5 cases	100% of cases	Ferrer Luwi Inez Ramos v Public Prosecutor: Abetting False Declarations under Employment of Foreign Manpower Act(Sep 2024) Public Prosecutor v Tan Zhenyang: Appeal Against Sentence for Voluntarily Causing Hurt in Parking Dispute(Sep 2018) Muhammad Khalis v Public Prosecutor: Grievous Hurt Sentencing Appeal(May 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Houston Johannus's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.2
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Won	42.3 parties avg	2.3	80%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Houston Johannus's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	4(80%)	80%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	3 12	Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ferrer Luwi Inez Ramos v Public Prosecutor: Abetting False Declarations under Employment of Foreign Manpower Act 24 Sep 2024 Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant)Won	24 Sep 2024	Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal against conviction allowedThe Prosecution's appeal against the sentence imposed was allowed.
2	Public Prosecutor v Tan Zhenyang: Appeal Against Sentence for Voluntarily Causing Hurt in Parking Dispute 27 Sep 2018 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	27 Sep 2018	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the original fine was replaced with a 5-week imprisonment sentence (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Muhammad Khalis v Public Prosecutor: Grievous Hurt Sentencing Appeal 10 May 2018 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	10 May 2018	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal allowed in partThe appeal was allowed in part, resulting in a reduced sentence for the appellant.
4	Tang Ling Lee v Public Prosecutor: Negligence Causing Grievous Hurt & Sentencing 24 Jan 2018 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	24 Jan 2018	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Sentence UpheldThe original sentence of one week's imprisonment was upheld.
5	Public Prosecutor v Rasheed Muhammad: Murder with Common Intention under Section 302(1) read with Section 34 of the Penal Code 16 Feb 2017 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	16 Feb 2017	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Guilty verdict for both accusedThe prosecution successfully proved its case beyond reasonable doubt, leading to the conviction of both accused.