Tang Ling Lee v Public Prosecutor: Negligence Causing Grievous Hurt & Sentencing

Tang Ling Lee appealed to the High Court of Singapore against a one-week imprisonment sentence for causing grievous hurt by a negligent act under section 338(b) of the Penal Code. Lee, while driving, made a negligent right turn, colliding with Vikaramen S/O A Elangovan's motorcycle, causing severe injuries. The High Court, presided over by See Kee Oon J, dismissed the appeal, upholding the original sentence, finding moderate to high culpability based on the circumstances of the accident and the severity of the victim's injuries.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Appeal Dismissed

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Appeal against a one-week imprisonment sentence for causing grievous hurt by a negligent act. The High Court dismissed the appeal, finding moderate to high culpability.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorRespondentGovernment AgencySentence UpheldWon
Houston Johannus of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Tang Ling LeeAppellantIndividualAppeal DismissedLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
See Kee OonJudgeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. The appellant made a right turn at a signalized junction.
  2. The appellant failed to keep a proper lookout for oncoming traffic.
  3. The appellant collided with a motorcyclist who had the right of way.
  4. The motorcyclist suffered multiple fractures and required multiple surgeries.
  5. The appellant was charged under s 338(b) of the Penal Code for causing grievous hurt by a negligent act.
  6. The traffic light was green for vehicles proceeding straight, but the right-turn green arrow was not lit.
  7. The appellant did not stop at the right turning pocket to look out for oncoming traffic.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Tang Ling Lee v Public Prosecutor, Magistrate’s Appeal No 9239 of 2017, [2018] SGHC 18

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Accident occurred at Ang Mo Kio Avenue 8 and Ang Mo Kio Avenue 5 junction
Appellant convicted and disqualified from driving
Hearing date
Hearing date
Appeal dismissed

7. Legal Issues

  1. Negligence
    • Outcome: The court found the appellant negligent in causing grievous hurt.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Failure to keep a proper lookout
      • Failure to yield right of way
  2. Sentencing
    • Outcome: The court upheld the one-week imprisonment sentence.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Appropriateness of custodial sentence
      • Mitigating factors
      • Aggravating factors

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Appeal against sentence of imprisonment

9. Cause of Actions

  • Negligence
  • Causing Grievous Hurt

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Appeals
  • Traffic Violations

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Public Prosecutor v Tang Ling LeeDistrict CourtYes[2017] SGDC 216SingaporeThe District Judge's grounds of decision in the lower court were referenced in the appeal.
Edwin s/o Suse Nathen v Public ProsecutorHigh CourtYes[2013] 4 SLR 1139SingaporeCited for factors affecting culpability in dangerous driving offences.
Public Prosecutor v Hue An LiHigh CourtYes[2014] 4 SLR 661SingaporeCited for the dichotomous interpretation of 'negligence' and 'rashness'.
Public Prosecutor v Koh Thiam HuatHigh CourtYes[2017] 4 SLR 1099SingaporeCited for factors affecting culpability in dangerous driving offences.
Stansilas Fabian Kester v Public ProsecutorHigh CourtYes[2017] 5 SLR 755SingaporeCited for factors affecting culpability in dangerous driving offences.
Public Prosecutor v Han Peck HoeDistrict CourtYes[2014] SGDC 58SingaporeCited as a sentencing precedent for s 338(b) offences.
Public Prosecutor v Aw Tai HockHigh CourtYes[2017] 5 SLR 1141SingaporeCited for factors affecting culpability for dangerous driving offences.
Public Prosecutor v Ganesan SivasankarHigh CourtYes[2017] 5 SLR 681SingaporeCited regarding presumptive sentencing ranges.
PP v Poh Teck HuatN/AYes[2003] 2 SLR(R) 299SingaporeCited regarding the interpretation of 'negligence' and 'rashness'.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Penal Code (Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed) s 338(b)Singapore
Road Traffic Act (Cap 276, 2004 Rev Ed) s 64(1)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Negligence
  • Grievous Hurt
  • Right Turn
  • Traffic Junction
  • Imprisonment
  • Disqualification
  • Culpability
  • Harm
  • Sentencing
  • Traffic Signal
  • Motorcycle
  • Collision

15.2 Keywords

  • negligence
  • grievous hurt
  • traffic accident
  • sentencing
  • criminal law
  • singapore

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Traffic Law
  • Sentencing