Ian Koh

Ian Koh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2005. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in admiralty and maritime law and injunctions. Their track record shows a 80.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ian Koh has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	16% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Ian Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 16% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ian Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Ian Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ian Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Ian Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ian Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading Act	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Ian Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ian Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ian Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Ian Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Letters of Indemnity	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ian Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Admiralty Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ian Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Letter of Indemnity Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ian Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appellate Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ian Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ian Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ian Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ian Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ian Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conversion	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ian Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ian Koh has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	2 cases	40% of cases	APL Co Pte Ltd v Voss Peer: Straight Bills of Lading & Delivery Obligations(Oct 2002) Voss Peer v APL Co Pte Ltd: Carrier's Delivery Obligation & Bill of Lading(Apr 2002)
Drew and Napier LLC	2 cases	40% of cases	Projector SA v Marubeni: Appeal Against Mandatory Injunction Over Vessel Arrest Under Letter of Indemnity(Jan 2005) Projector SA v Marubeni: Amendment of Notice of Appeal and Prejudice to Respondent(Dec 2004)
Drew & Napier	1 cases	20% of cases	Hyosung (HK) Ltd v Owners of Hilal I: Stay of Proceedings and Arbitration Clause Incorporation(Dec 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ian Koh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Won	42.0 parties avg	2.0	80%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ian Koh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20%)	20%
Won	4(80%)	80%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Projector SA v Marubeni: Appeal Against Mandatory Injunction Over Vessel Arrest Under Letter of Indemnity 24 Jan 2005 Marubeni International Petroleum (S) Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	24 Jan 2005	Marubeni International Petroleum (S) Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.
2	Projector SA v Marubeni: Amendment of Notice of Appeal and Prejudice to Respondent 02 Dec 2004 Marubeni International Petroleum (S) Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff)Lost	02 Dec 2004	Marubeni International Petroleum (S) Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal LostAppeal lost; Projector SA granted leave to amend notice of appeal (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	APL Co Pte Ltd v Voss Peer: Straight Bills of Lading & Delivery Obligations 02 Oct 2002 Voss Peer (Respondent)Won	02 Oct 2002	Voss Peer (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentJudgment for the respondent with costs. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Voss Peer v APL Co Pte Ltd: Carrier's Delivery Obligation & Bill of Lading 22 Apr 2002 Voss Peer (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	22 Apr 2002	Voss Peer (Plaintiff, Respondent): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff; the amount of DM60,100.00 was converted to its Singapore dollar equivalent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Hyosung (HK) Ltd v Owners of Hilal I: Stay of Proceedings and Arbitration Clause Incorporation 06 Dec 2000 Owners of the Ship or Vessel `Hilal I` (Defendant)Won	06 Dec 2000	Owners of the Ship or Vessel `Hilal I` (Defendant): Appeal AllowedThe defendants' appeal for the release of the vessel was allowed.