Isaac Tito Shane

Isaac Tito Shane is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2012 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 13 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in winding up and fiduciary duties. Their track record shows a 46.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 15% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated expertise across 51 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	10 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	5 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	4 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	4 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Implied Terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Set-off	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Money and moneylenders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Academic Misconduct	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Prevention principle	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to cooperate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ancillary disclosure order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Adjudication	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Electricity Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admission to the Bar	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Isaac Tito Shane has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Isaac Tito Shane has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 13 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tito Isaac & Co LLP	13 cases	100% of cases	SW Trustees v Teodros Ashenafi: Avoidance of Undervalue Transactions & Director's Duties(Dec 2024) Star Engineering v Pollisum Engineering: Stay of Proceedings in Favor of Arbitration(Aug 2024) Re Lee Jun Ming Chester: Admission as Advocate and Solicitor Despite Past Offense(Oct 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Isaac Tito Shane's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 2 (15%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	52.4 parties avg	2.4	38%
Partial	26.0 parties avg	6.0	15%
Won	62.9 parties avg	2.9	46%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	32.8 parties avg	2.8
2021	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	26.3 parties avg	6.3

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Isaac Tito Shane's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(38%)	38%
Partial	2(15%)	15%
Won	6(46%)	46%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	9,000.00	1,800.005 cases	5
USD	1,028,455.00	1,028,455.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2021	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 13 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	SW Trustees v Teodros Ashenafi: Avoidance of Undervalue Transactions & Director's Duties 15 Dec 2024 Farooq Ahmad Mann (Plaintiff)Partial	15 Dec 2024	Farooq Ahmad Mann (Plaintiff): Partial Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for Plaintiff against Sino Africa and Teodros Ashenafi.
2	Star Engineering v Pollisum Engineering: Stay of Proceedings in Favor of Arbitration 18 Aug 2024 Pollisum Engineering Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	18 Aug 2024	Pollisum Engineering Pte Ltd (Respondent): Stay of Proceedings GrantedPollisum Engineering's application for a stay of proceedings in favor of arbitration was granted.
3	Re Lee Jun Ming Chester: Admission as Advocate and Solicitor Despite Past Offense 08 Oct 2023 Chester Lee Jun Ming (Applicant)Won	08 Oct 2023	Chester Lee Jun Ming (Applicant): Application AllowedThe court was satisfied that Mr. Lee had reformed his character since his offense and was a fit and proper person for admission to the bar.
4	Ng Koon Yee Mickey v Mah Sau Cheong: Share Purchase Agreement Termination & Set-Off 29 Sep 2022 Mah Sau Cheong (Respondent, Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim)Lost	29 Sep 2022	Mah Sau Cheong (Respondent, Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed. Mah Sau Cheong was not entitled to reclaim the Tranche 1 and 2 Payments. Mah's claim was dismissed.
5	Fernandez v Woi: Breach of Agency & Fiduciary Duties in Nominee Director Arrangement 16 May 2021 Daniel Fernandez (Plaintiff)Won	16 May 2021	Daniel Fernandez (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; the first defendant is ordered to return the amount of US$1,028,455.00 to the plaintiff, with interest at the rate of 5.33% from the date of the writ to the date of judgment. I order this sum to be paid to the plaintiff rather than the second defendant’s bank account because the custodial fiduciary breach did not arise out of the first defendant’s position as director of the second defendant, but out of her role as agent to the plaintiff, so the funds should be compensated to him. Assumed USD, as the judgment refers to USD amounts.
6	Parikh v Sakraney: Interpretation of Contractual Terms for Payment of Fees 01 Mar 2021 Ishan Anoop Sakraney (Defendant)Lost	01 Mar 2021	Ishan Anoop Sakraney (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe court found in favor of the plaintiff's interpretation of the contract.
7	CIK v CIL: Contract Formation & Jurisdictional Objection in Construction Dispute 09 Dec 2020 CIL (Defendant)Lost	09 Dec 2020	CIL (Defendant): Adjudication Determination set asideAdjudication Determination set aside on the ground that there was jurisdiction because a written contract existed. Costs of this originating summons are to be paid by the defendant to the plaintiff, fixed at $5,000 all inclusive. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	GVR Global Pte Ltd v Wayne Burt Pte Ltd: Stay of Winding-Up Order Application 29 Apr 2020 M.R.K. Enterprises Private Ltd (Defendant)Won	29 Apr 2020	M.R.K. Enterprises Private Ltd (Defendant): Winding-up Order UpheldThe second defendant's winding-up order against the first defendant was upheld.
9	Choo Ah Sam v Kieu Ka Tong: Contract Dispute over York Launch Service Shares 29 Mar 2020 Kieu Kim Sen (Qiu Jinxing) (Defendant)Won	29 Mar 2020	Kieu Kim Sen (Qiu Jinxing) (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court found that the arrangement was a loan agreement and dismissed the plaintiff's claim.
10	Twiss v Twiss: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Wife Maintenance after Divorce 01 Oct 2015 Twiss, Yvonne Prendergast (Respondent)Partial	01 Oct 2015	Twiss, Yvonne Prendergast (Respondent): Assets divided 75/25 in her favor; maintenance of $4,000/month affirmedAssets divided 75/25 in her favor; maintenance of $4,000/month affirmed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	Lena Leowardi v Yeap Cheen Soo: Moneylending Act & Guarantee Enforcement 25 Nov 2014 Lena Leowardi (Appellant)Won	25 Nov 2014	Lena Leowardi (Appellant): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed. Costs of the appeal and of the trial below are awarded to the Appellant. These costs are to be taxed if not agreed. There will be the usual consequential orders. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
12	Chenet Finance Ltd v Lim Poh Yen: Conspiracy, Share Transfer, and Pre-emption Rights 02 Aug 2012 Chenet Finance Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant)Lost	02 Aug 2012	Chenet Finance Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant): Claim for unlawful act conspiracy dismissedChenet's claim for unlawful act conspiracy against Allene, Abu Bakar, and Berlian was dismissed.
13	Khian Heng Construction v Public Prosecutor: Damage to Electricity Cable During Earthworks 10 Jul 2012 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	10 Jul 2012	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Conviction OverturnedThe appeal against the conviction was allowed, and the original fine is to be refunded. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.