J Jayaletchmi

J Jayaletchmi is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 10 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and constitutional law. Their track record shows a 70.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 30% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

J Jayaletchmi has demonstrated expertise across 34 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal procedure and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Procedure	5 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	J Jayaletchmi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	J Jayaletchmi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized89% relevance score	J Jayaletchmi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	J Jayaletchmi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	J Jayaletchmi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	J Jayaletchmi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	J Jayaletchmi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	J Jayaletchmi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	J Jayaletchmi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Striking Out Applications	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	J Jayaletchmi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	J Jayaletchmi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	J Jayaletchmi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	J Jayaletchmi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	J Jayaletchmi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	J Jayaletchmi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	J Jayaletchmi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	J Jayaletchmi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Framework	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	J Jayaletchmi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	J Jayaletchmi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Young Offenders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	J Jayaletchmi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Review	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	J Jayaletchmi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	J Jayaletchmi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	J Jayaletchmi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	J Jayaletchmi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	J Jayaletchmi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	J Jayaletchmi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	J Jayaletchmi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	J Jayaletchmi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	J Jayaletchmi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	J Jayaletchmi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	J Jayaletchmi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	J Jayaletchmi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	J Jayaletchmi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	J Jayaletchmi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

J Jayaletchmi has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	6 cases	60% of cases	Masoud Rahimi v Attorney-General: Striking Out Application, Constitutional Rights of Prisoners Awaiting Capital Punishment(Feb 2025) Sulaiman bin Jumari v Public Prosecutor: Stay of Execution & Constitutionality of Post-Appeal Applications(Oct 2024) Masoud Rahimi v Attorney-General: Constitutional Challenge to Post-appeal Applications in Capital Cases Act(Mar 2024)
Advocatus Law LLP	2 cases	20% of cases	JWR Pte Ltd v Edmond Pereira Law Corp: Negligence, Breach of Duty, and Contract Breach(Nov 2019) Pradeepto Kumar Biswas v East India Capital Management: Employment Contract Dispute and Fiduciary Duty Breach(Aug 2019)
Withers KhattarWong LLP	2 cases	20% of cases	Public Prosecutor v CNJ: Sentencing for Culpable Homicide by Young Offender(Jan 2022) Law Society of Singapore v Constance Margreat Paglar: Disciplinary Proceedings & Professional Conduct(Feb 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of J Jayaletchmi's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 11.5
Complex Cases: 3 (30%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.5 parties avg	2.5	20%
Remanded	12.0 parties avg	2.0	10%
Won	714.9 parties avg	14.9	70%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	314.0 parties avg	14.0
2024	219.5 parties avg	19.5
2025	132.0 parties avg	32.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of J Jayaletchmi's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(20%)	20%
Remanded	1(10%)	10%
Won	7(70%)	70%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2021	1 1	Remanded: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2024	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2025	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 10 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Masoud Rahimi v Attorney-General: Striking Out Application, Constitutional Rights of Prisoners Awaiting Capital Punishment 04 Feb 2025 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	04 Feb 2025	Attorney-General (Respondent): Application to strike out originating application allowedApplication to strike out originating application allowed because the applicants lacked standing and their challenges had no chance of success.
2	Sulaiman bin Jumari v Public Prosecutor: Stay of Execution & Constitutionality of Post-Appeal Applications 14 Oct 2024 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	14 Oct 2024	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application dismissed summarilyThe Public Prosecutor successfully opposed the application for a stay of execution.
3	Masoud Rahimi v Attorney-General: Constitutional Challenge to Post-appeal Applications in Capital Cases Act 26 Mar 2024 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	26 Mar 2024	Attorney-General (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed due to the appellants' lack of standing.
4	Lee Shin Nan v Public Prosecutor: Drink Driving, Repeat Offender, Sentencing 17 Dec 2023 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	17 Dec 2023	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Original Sentence AffirmedThe original sentence of eight weeks’ imprisonment, a fine of $10,000, and a lifetime disqualification order was affirmed.
5	Rahimi v Attorney-General: Constitutional Challenge to Post-appeal Applications in Capital Cases Act 04 Dec 2023 The Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	04 Dec 2023	The Attorney-General (Respondent): Application to Strike Out GrantedThe Attorney-General's application to strike out the originating application was granted.
6	PP v Yogesswaran & Teo: Trafficking of Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act 18 Jun 2023 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	18 Jun 2023	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): ConvictionBoth accused convicted on the charges against them.
7	Public Prosecutor v CNJ: Sentencing for Culpable Homicide by Young Offender 23 Jan 2022 CNJ (Defendant)Lost	23 Jan 2022	CNJ (Defendant): Sentence of five years’ detention imposedThe accused was sentenced to five years’ detention.
8	Law Society of Singapore v Constance Margreat Paglar: Disciplinary Proceedings & Professional Conduct 04 Feb 2021 The Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Remanded	04 Feb 2021	The Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Matter remitted to the Disciplinary TribunalThe court found that there was no cause of sufficient gravity for disciplinary action and remitted the matter to the Disciplinary Tribunal.
9	JWR Pte Ltd v Edmond Pereira Law Corp: Negligence, Breach of Duty, and Contract Breach 11 Nov 2019 Edmond Avethas Pereira (Defendant)Won	11 Nov 2019	Edmond Avethas Pereira (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Pradeepto Kumar Biswas v East India Capital Management: Employment Contract Dispute and Fiduciary Duty Breach 07 Aug 2019 East India Capital Management Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff-in-Counterclaim)Lost	07 Aug 2019	East India Capital Management Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff-in-Counterclaim): Counterclaim dismissedEICM's counterclaim against Pradeepto is dismissed.