James Lee

James Lee is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2005. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and sentencing. Their track record shows a 88.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 13% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

James Lee has demonstrated expertise across 32 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	7 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	James Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	James Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	James Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	James Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Offences	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	James Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	James Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	James Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Theft	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	James Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Securities Fraud	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	James Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	James Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Diminished Responsibility	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	James Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	James Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	James Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	James Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Abetment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	James Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	James Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	James Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	James Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Robbery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	James Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Gang-robbery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	James Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Market Misconduct	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	James Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Overstayer	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	James Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Robbery with hurt	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	James Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Late Trading	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	James Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Crime	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	James Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	James Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	James Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	James Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Immigration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	James Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Import and Export Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	James Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	James Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	James Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

James Lee has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Deputy Public Prosecutor	4 cases	50% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Vanmaichelvan: Drug Trafficking Sentence Appeal(Apr 2005) Public Prosecutor v Low Ah Soy: Culpable Homicide and Mischief Sentencing(Nov 2004) Public Prosecutor v Cheong Hock Lai: Late Trading, Securities Industry Act, and Deterrent Sentencing(Jun 2004)
Deputy Public Prosecutors	2 cases	25% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Somrak Senkham: Robbery with Hurt and Immigration Offences(Aug 2004) Lim Teck Chye v PP: Abetment by Conspiracy in Bunkering Industry(Apr 2004)
Attorney-General’s Chambers	1 cases	13% of cases	PP v Ali bin Serti: Trafficking of Diamorphine, Misuse of Drugs Act(Nov 2000)
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	13% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Sabtu bin Abdullah: Importation of Cannabis under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Jan 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of James Lee's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.6
Complex Cases: 1 (13%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	13%
Won	72.4 parties avg	2.4	88%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	52.8 parties avg	2.8
2005	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of James Lee's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(13%)	13%
Won	7(88%)	88%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	5 14	Lost: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 4 cases (80.0%)
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v Vanmaichelvan: Drug Trafficking Sentence Appeal 21 Apr 2005 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	21 Apr 2005	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Sentence upheldThe appeal against the sentence was dismissed.
2	Public Prosecutor v Low Ah Soy: Culpable Homicide and Mischief Sentencing 04 Nov 2004 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	04 Nov 2004	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Sentence of four years’ imprisonment imposedThe accused was sentenced to four years’ imprisonment.
3	Public Prosecutor v Somrak Senkham: Robbery with Hurt and Immigration Offences 10 Aug 2004 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	10 Aug 2004	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for the ProsecutionThe Public Prosecutor secured convictions against both accused for robbery with hurt and against the first accused for an immigration offence.
4	Public Prosecutor v Cheong Hock Lai: Late Trading, Securities Industry Act, and Deterrent Sentencing 14 Jun 2004 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Lost	14 Jun 2004	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe Prosecution's appeal against the sentences imposed on the respondents was dismissed.
5	Lee Cheong Ngan v PP: Building Act Violation & Plea Validity 04 May 2004 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	04 May 2004	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application dismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended against the application to set aside the conviction.
6	Lim Teck Chye v PP: Abetment by Conspiracy in Bunkering Industry 13 Apr 2004 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	13 Apr 2004	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal against conviction dismissedThe appeal against conviction was dismissed.
7	Public Prosecutor v Sabtu bin Abdullah: Importation of Cannabis under the Misuse of Drugs Act 09 Jan 2001 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	09 Jan 2001	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused found guilty on the charges.
8	PP v Ali bin Serti: Trafficking of Diamorphine, Misuse of Drugs Act 26 Nov 2000 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	26 Nov 2000	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): ConvictionAccused was found guilty and convicted.