Public Prosecutor v Sabtu bin Abdullah: Importation of Cannabis under the Misuse of Drugs Act
In Public Prosecutor v Sabtu bin Abdullah, the High Court of Singapore found Sabtu bin Abdullah guilty of two charges under section 7 of the Misuse of Drugs Act for importing 3,285.8g of cannabis and 1,452.8g of cannabis mixture into Singapore on 21 April 2000. The court, presided over by Justice Kan Ting Chiu, imposed the mandatory death sentence after the accused pleaded guilty and the prosecution proved its case.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court1.2 Outcome
Accused found guilty and imposed the mandatory death sentence.
1.3 Case Type
Criminal
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Sabtu bin Abdullah pleaded guilty to importing cannabis into Singapore. The High Court found him guilty and imposed the mandatory death sentence.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public Prosecutor | Prosecution | Government Agency | Judgment for Prosecution | Won | Christina Koh of Public Prosecutor James Lee of Public Prosecutor Paul Chia of Public Prosecutor Kelvin Chua of Public Prosecutor |
Sabtu bin Abdullah alias Ramli bin Abdullah | Defendant | Individual | Guilty | Lost |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Kan Ting Chiu | Judge | Yes |
4. Counsels
Counsel Name | Organization |
---|---|
Christina Koh | Public Prosecutor |
James Lee | Public Prosecutor |
Paul Chia | Public Prosecutor |
Kelvin Chua | Public Prosecutor |
Ahmad Nizam | Muzammil Nizam & Partners |
Rashidah binte Kader Saheer | Surian & Partners |
4. Facts
- The accused imported 3,285.8g of cannabis and 1,452.8g of cannabis mixture into Singapore.
- The accused pleaded guilty to both charges.
- The drugs were found in the boot and spare tyre compartment of the accused's car.
- The accused admitted he was to be paid $300 a slab to bring the drugs into Singapore.
- The accused stated he needed money due to being unemployed and his wife's medical expenses.
5. Formal Citations
- Public Prosecutor v Sabtu bin Abdullah alias Ramli bin Abdullah, CC 2/2001, [2001] SGHC 8
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Accused imported cannabis and cannabis mixture into Singapore at Woodlands Checkpoint. | |
Accused and his wife arrived at Woodlands Checkpoint and were stopped for a random check. | |
Judgment issued. |
7. Legal Issues
- Importation of Drugs
- Outcome: The court found that the accused had imported cannabis and cannabis mixture into Singapore, satisfying the elements of the offence.
- Category: Substantive
8. Remedies Sought
- Conviction
- Mandatory death sentence
9. Cause of Actions
- Importation of controlled drugs
10. Practice Areas
- Criminal Litigation
11. Industries
- No industries specified
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ko Mun Cheung & Anor v PP | Unknown | Yes | [1992] 2 SLR 87 | Singapore | Cited to support the definition of 'import' under the Interpretation Act. |
Ng Kwok Chun & Anor v PP | Unknown | Yes | [1993] 1 SLR 55 | Singapore | Cited to support the definition of 'import' under the Interpretation Act. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
Misuse of Drugs Act, section 7 | Singapore |
Interpretation Act, section 2 | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Cannabis
- Importation
- Misuse of Drugs Act
- Woodlands Checkpoint
- Ganja
15.2 Keywords
- cannabis
- importation
- drugs
- singapore
- death sentence
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Misuse of Drugs Act | 95 |
Criminal Law | 70 |
Offences | 65 |
Import and Export Law | 60 |
16. Subjects
- Criminal Law
- Drug Trafficking