Jasmine Chin-Sabado

Jasmine Chin-Sabado is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 89.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jasmine Chin-Sabado has demonstrated expertise across 34 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	9 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Jasmine Chin-Sabado has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	7 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Jasmine Chin-Sabado has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	6 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized97% relevance score	Jasmine Chin-Sabado has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	5 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Jasmine Chin-Sabado has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Jasmine Chin-Sabado has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Jasmine Chin-Sabado has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jasmine Chin-Sabado has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Jasmine Chin-Sabado has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Offences	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jasmine Chin-Sabado has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jasmine Chin-Sabado has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Jasmine Chin-Sabado has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Diminished Responsibility	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jasmine Chin-Sabado has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jasmine Chin-Sabado has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Jasmine Chin-Sabado has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Private Prosecution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Jasmine Chin-Sabado has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Importation of controlled drugs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jasmine Chin-Sabado has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Voluntariness of Statements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jasmine Chin-Sabado has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Psychiatric Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jasmine Chin-Sabado has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jasmine Chin-Sabado has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Abuse and Neglect	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jasmine Chin-Sabado has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sexual Grooming	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jasmine Chin-Sabado has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jasmine Chin-Sabado has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sex Crimes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jasmine Chin-Sabado has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Jasmine Chin-Sabado has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Children and Young Persons Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jasmine Chin-Sabado has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Murder	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jasmine Chin-Sabado has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Jasmine Chin-Sabado has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intermittent Explosive Disorder	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Jasmine Chin-Sabado has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jasmine Chin-Sabado has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jasmine Chin-Sabado has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Adducing fresh evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jasmine Chin-Sabado has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating course of justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Jasmine Chin-Sabado has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Jasmine Chin-Sabado has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Consent of Public Prosecutor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Jasmine Chin-Sabado has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jasmine Chin-Sabado has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	9 cases	100% of cases	PP v Suthakar J Raman: Drug Trafficking - Common Intention under Misuse of Drugs Act(Jun 2017) Public Prosecutor v Abd Helmi: Trafficking Diamorphine & Knowledge of Drug Nature(May 2017) PP v Pham Duyen Quyen: Importation of Methamphetamine & Misuse of Drugs Act(Oct 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jasmine Chin-Sabado's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.2
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	11%
Won	82.1 parties avg	2.1	89%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2016	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	22.5 parties avg	2.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jasmine Chin-Sabado's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(11%)	11%
Won	8(89%)	89%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	4 4	Won: 4 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Suthakar J Raman: Drug Trafficking - Common Intention under Misuse of Drugs Act 27 Jun 2017 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	27 Jun 2017	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Guilty as chargedBoth accused persons were found guilty as charged.
2	Public Prosecutor v Abd Helmi: Trafficking Diamorphine & Knowledge of Drug Nature 31 May 2017 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	31 May 2017	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Guilty as chargedThe accused was found guilty as charged.
3	PP v Pham Duyen Quyen: Importation of Methamphetamine & Misuse of Drugs Act 16 Oct 2016 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	16 Oct 2016	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): WonThe accused was found guilty as charged.
4	Public Prosecutor v Irwan bin Ali: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 08 Sep 2016 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	08 Sep 2016	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe accused was found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
5	PP v Lee Seow Peng: Rape, Sexual Grooming, & Children and Young Persons Act Offences 25 May 2016 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	25 May 2016	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): ConvictionAccused convicted on all charges.
6	Mohd Suief v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking, Common Intention, Misuse of Drugs Act 25 Jan 2016 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	25 Jan 2016	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe appeal by Mohd Suief bin Ismail was dismissed, upholding the original conviction and sentence.
7	Public Prosecutor v V Shanmugam: Drug Trafficking, Common Intention, and Application of Misuse of Drugs Act 02 Feb 2015 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Partial	02 Feb 2015	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): PartialOne defendant sentenced to death, the other to life imprisonment.
8	Lim Ghim Peow v PP: Culpable Homicide & Diminished Responsibility Sentencing 16 Oct 2014 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	16 Oct 2014	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Sentence AffirmedThe Public Prosecutor's original sentence of 20 years' imprisonment was affirmed by the Court of Appeal.
9	PP v Lim Ghim Peow: Culpable Homicide, Major Depressive Disorder & Sentencing Principles 26 Jan 2014 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	26 Jan 2014	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe accused was sentenced to 20 years' imprisonment.