PP v Suthakar J Raman: Drug Trafficking - Common Intention under Misuse of Drugs Act

Suthakar J Raman and Prabu N Pathmanathan were tried in the High Court of Singapore before Choo Han Teck J for drug trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act. They were charged with having the common intention to traffic in 227.82g of diamorphine. The court found both accused persons guilty as charged, convicting them accordingly.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court of the Republic of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Both accused persons guilty as charged and convict them accordingly.

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Suthakar and Prabu were convicted for drug trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act, for importing diamorphine into Singapore.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorProsecutionGovernment AgencyGuilty as chargedWon
Chin Jincheng of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Lu Yiwei of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Jasmine Chin-Sabado of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Suthakar J RamanDefendantIndividualGuilty as chargedLost
Prabu N PathmanathanDefendantIndividualGuilty as chargedLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Choo Han TeckJudgeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. Suthakar drove a Malaysian registered Toyota Hilux to Woodlands Checkpoint.
  2. ICA officers found packets of brownish granular substances under the rear seat.
  3. The seized substances contained not less than 227.82g of diamorphine.
  4. Prabu instructed Suthakar to park the Toyota Hilux outside Woodlands Checkpoint.
  5. Prabu admitted to arranging for Suthakar to bring in "kalu" (heroin).
  6. Suthakar admitted to knowing the car contained "jaman" (drugs).

5. Formal Citations

  1. Public Prosecutor v Suthakar J Raman and another, Criminal Case No 30 of 2017, [2017] SGHC 142

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Suthakar drove Toyota Hilux to Woodlands Checkpoint.
ICA officers found packets of brownish granular substances.
CNB officers seized twenty packets of brownish substances.
Suthakar called Prabu as part of CNB’s follow-up operation.
CNB officers arrested Prabu at Woodlands Town Garden car park.
Two screwdrivers retrieved from Prabu's car.
Trial began.
Trial began.
Trial began.
Trial began.
Trial began.
Trial began.
Trial began.
Trial began.
Judgment reserved.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Drug Trafficking
    • Outcome: The court found both accused persons guilty of drug trafficking.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Common Intention
    • Outcome: The court found that both accused persons had the common intention to traffic drugs.
    • Category: Substantive
  3. Presumption of Knowledge
    • Outcome: The court found that the presumption of knowledge under s 18(2) of the Act was not rebutted by either accused.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Conviction
  2. Sentencing

9. Cause of Actions

  • Drug Trafficking

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Law
  • Drug Trafficking

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
No cited cases

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Misuse of Drugs Act (Cap 185, 2008 Rev Ed) s 5(1)(c)Singapore
Penal Code (Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed) s 34Singapore
Misuse of Drugs Act s 33(1)Singapore
Misuse of Drugs Act s 33BSingapore
Misuse of Drugs Act s 18(2)Singapore
Misuse of Drugs Act s 18(4)Singapore
Misuse of Drugs Act s 33B(2)(a)(iii)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Diamorphine
  • Drug trafficking
  • Common intention
  • Presumption of knowledge
  • Woodlands Checkpoint
  • ICA
  • CNB
  • Kalu
  • Jaman

15.2 Keywords

  • Drug trafficking
  • Diamorphine
  • Singapore
  • Misuse of Drugs Act
  • Common intention

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Drug Trafficking
  • Statutory Offences