Jean Lim

Jean Lim is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2004. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in company law and director's duties. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jean Lim has demonstrated expertise across 11 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and director's duties.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	3 cases	19% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Jean Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 19% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Jean Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jean Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	2 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Jean Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jean Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jean Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jean Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Shadow directors	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jean Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jean Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
De facto director	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jean Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Shadow director	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jean Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jean Lim has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rodyk and Davidson	2 cases	67% of cases	Heap Huat Rubber v Kong Choot Sian: Directors' Remuneration Dispute(May 2004) Heap Huat Rubber v Kong Choot: Shadow Directors & Fiduciary Duty(Mar 2004)
Rodyk & Davidson	1 cases	33% of cases	Heap Huat Rubber v Kong Choot Sian: Director's Duties & Company Assets(Jun 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jean Lim's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 9.0
Complex Cases: 3 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	113.0 parties avg	13.0	33%
Partial	27.0 parties avg	7.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	113.0 parties avg	13.0
2004	27.0 parties avg	7.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jean Lim's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Partial	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
MYR	925,200.00	925,200.001 cases	1
SGD	86,000.00	28,666.673 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	2 2	Partial: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Heap Huat Rubber v Kong Choot Sian: Directors' Remuneration Dispute 27 May 2004 HHR Construction and Supply Sdn Bhd (Appellant)Partial	27 May 2004	HHR Construction and Supply Sdn Bhd (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartKong Choot Sian to refund RM308,400 to HHR Properties, HHR Trading and HHR Construction (assumed MYR, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Heap Huat Rubber v Kong Choot: Shadow Directors & Fiduciary Duty 29 Mar 2004 HHR Construction and Supply Sdn Bhd (Appellant)Partial	29 Mar 2004	HHR Construction and Supply Sdn Bhd (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part, with certain payments to be refunded. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Heap Huat Rubber v Kong Choot Sian: Director's Duties & Company Assets 26 Jun 2003 HHR Construction and Supply Sdn Bhd (Plaintiff)Lost	26 Jun 2003	HHR Construction and Supply Sdn Bhd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).