Jeremy Gan

Jeremy Gan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and commercial law. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 80% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jeremy Gan has demonstrated expertise across 29 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Jeremy Gan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Jeremy Gan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Damages	4 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Jeremy Gan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Jeremy Gan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Jeremy Gan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jeremy Gan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jeremy Gan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jeremy Gan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jeremy Gan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jeremy Gan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jeremy Gan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jeremy Gan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jeremy Gan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jeremy Gan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jeremy Gan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jeremy Gan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jeremy Gan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jeremy Gan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interest	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jeremy Gan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Court Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Jeremy Gan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jeremy Gan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trespass	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jeremy Gan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Nuisance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jeremy Gan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Jeremy Gan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Neighbouring Properties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Jeremy Gan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jeremy Gan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jeremy Gan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assault	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jeremy Gan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jeremy Gan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jeremy Gan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	3 cases	60% of cases	PT Sandipala Arthaputra v STMicroelectronics: Clarification on Interest Calculation(Aug 2017) PT Sandipala v STMicroelectronics: Breach of Contract, Conspiracy, & Chip Supply Dispute(May 2017) Shi Ka Yee v Nasrat Lucas Muzayyin: Tree Pruning Dispute and Tort Claims(Jul 2016)
Rajah & Tann LLP	2 cases	40% of cases	BCBC Singapore v PT Bayan Resources: Breach of Contract & Damages(Jan 2019) BCBC Singapore v PT Bayan: Breach of Contract & Remedies in Joint Venture Coal Briquetting Project(Jul 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jeremy Gan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 4 (80%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	20%
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	20%
Won	35.8 parties avg	5.8	60%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	35.8 parties avg	5.8
2019	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jeremy Gan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20%)	20%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	3(60%)	60%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2
USD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	3 12	Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	BCBC Singapore v PT Bayan Resources: Breach of Contract & Damages 08 Jan 2019 BCBC Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	08 Jan 2019	BCBC Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Financial ability to fund KSC establishedThe court found that BCBCS had the financial ability to fund KSC until the completion of commissioning and testing at the Tabang Plant or until June 2012.
2	PT Sandipala Arthaputra v STMicroelectronics: Clarification on Interest Calculation 06 Aug 2017 STMICROELECTRONICS ASIA PACIFIC PTE LTD (Defendant)Won	06 Aug 2017	STMICROELECTRONICS ASIA PACIFIC PTE LTD (Defendant): Claim DismissedSandipala's claims against STMicroelectronics Asia Pacific Pte Ltd were dismissed.
3	BCBC Singapore v PT Bayan: Breach of Contract & Remedies in Joint Venture Coal Briquetting Project 24 Jul 2017 Binderless Coal Briquetting Company Pty Limited (Plaintiff)Partial	24 Jul 2017	Binderless Coal Briquetting Company Pty Limited (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff in partThe court found that the Defendant repudiated the Joint Venture Deed. The monetary amount is set to 0.00 as the quantum of damages will be determined in Tranche 3. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	PT Sandipala v STMicroelectronics: Breach of Contract, Conspiracy, & Chip Supply Dispute 11 May 2017 STMICROELECTRONICS ASIA PACIFIC PTE LTD (Defendant)Won	11 May 2017	STMICROELECTRONICS ASIA PACIFIC PTE LTD (Defendant): Claims DismissedAll claims against STMicroelectronics were dismissed.
5	Shi Ka Yee v Nasrat Lucas Muzayyin: Tree Pruning Dispute and Tort Claims 19 Jul 2016 Shi Ka Yee (Applicant)Lost	19 Jul 2016	Shi Ka Yee (Applicant): Leave to appeal refusedShi Ka Yee's application for leave to appeal the magistrate's decision was refused.