PT Sandipala Arthaputra v STMicroelectronics: Clarification on Interest Calculation

In this supplemental judgment, the High Court of Singapore clarifies the dates from which interest is to run on the damages awarded to Oxel Systems Pte Ltd in its counterclaim against PT Sandipala Arthaputra, Mr. Paulus Tannos, and Ms. Catherine Tannos. The original action arose from a contract for the supply of microchips. The court specifies the interest calculation for the price of chips, down payments, losses suffered from payments to Danatel and Logii, and loss of profits, based on contractual and default rates.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court of the Republic of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Clarifications provided on the dates from which interest is to run on the awarded sums.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Supplemental Judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Supplemental judgment clarifying the dates from which interest is to run on damages awarded to Oxel Systems for breach of contract.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
George WeiJudgeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. Sandipala contracted with Oxel for the supply of microchips from ST-AP.
  2. Oxel delivered 11,263,289 chips to Sandipala between January and April 2012.
  3. Oxel issued 11 invoices to Sandipala for the delivered chips, which Sandipala did not settle.
  4. Oxel issued an invoice to Sandipala for the unpaid 20% down payment on 2,331,778 chips on 26 January 2012.
  5. Oxel made payments to Danatel and Logii.
  6. Oxel was to deliver all 100m chips to Sandipala by the end of the fourth quarter of 2012.

5. Formal Citations

  1. PT Sandipala Arthaputra v STMicroelectronics Asia Pacific Pte Ltd and others, Suit No 542 of 2012, [2017] SGHC 191

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Chips delivered to Sandipala between January to April
Oxel issued invoice to Sandipala for down payment
Agreement between Oxel and Sandipala to supply 100m chips
Hearing in chambers regarding clarifications on interest
Supplemental judgment issued
Invoice 1 issued for US$241,003.68
Invoice 2 issued for US$266,216.16
Invoice 3 issued for US$539,942.88
Invoice 4 issued for US$733,816.32
Invoice 5 issued for US$525,840.96
Invoice 6 issued for US$447,300.96
Invoice 7 issued for US$422,864.64
Invoice 8 issued for US$376,225.92
Invoice 9 issued for US$294,960.00
Invoice 10 issued for US$1,292,577.60
Invoice 11 issued for US$265,629.60
Payment to Danatel
Payment to Logii
Payment to Logii
Payment to Logii
Payment to Logii
Latest possible invoice date for 100m chips

7. Legal Issues

  1. Interest Calculation
    • Outcome: The court clarified the dates from which interest is to run on the awarded sums, specifying the contractual and default rates.
    • Category: Procedural

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Monetary Damages
  2. Interest

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Contract

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation

11. Industries

  • Semiconductors

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
PT Sandipala Arthraputra v STMicroElectronics Asia Pacific Pte Ltd and othersHigh CourtYes[2017] SGHC 102SingaporeSets out the facts of the action in full.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Civil Law Act (Cap 43) Section 12Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Microchips
  • Interest
  • Contractual Rate
  • Default Rate
  • Invoices
  • Down Payment
  • Shipments

15.2 Keywords

  • interest
  • damages
  • microchips
  • contract
  • singapore
  • oxel
  • sandipala

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Contract Dispute
  • Interest Calculation