Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen

Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 14 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in minority oppression and fiduciary duties. Their track record shows a 29.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 7 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated expertise across 52 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and minority oppression.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	6 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	6 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized89% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	5 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	4 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Implied Terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Discharge	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Frustration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Valuation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inherent Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Certainty of terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Extended doctrine of res judicata	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Investment Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Video Link	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Accounting and Inquiry	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Loans	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Transfer of Cases	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Issue Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 14 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	14 cases	100% of cases	Kiri Industries v Senda International: Minority Oppression, En Bloc Sale, and Share Valuation(Jan 2025) AI MTBL SPV v MTBL Global Fund: Breach of Contract & Frustration in Investment Redemption(Oct 2024) Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: En Bloc Sale, Priority of Proceeds & Costs(Aug 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.7
Complex Cases: 7 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	7%
Neutral	43.3 parties avg	3.3	29%
Partial	54.6 parties avg	4.6	36%
Won	43.0 parties avg	3.0	29%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2021	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2022	54.0 parties avg	4.0
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2025	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(7%)	7%
Neutral	4(29%)	29%
Partial	5(36%)	36%
Won	4(29%)	29%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	654,153.79	163,538.454 cases	4
USD	21,633,540.66	10,816,770.332 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	5 122	Lost: 1 cases (20.0%) Partial: 2 cases (40.0%) Won: 2 cases (40.0%)
2023	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	3 111	Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2025	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 14 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Kiri Industries v Senda International: Minority Oppression, En Bloc Sale, and Share Valuation 30 Jan 2025 DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Neutral	30 Jan 2025	DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): NeutralDyStar took no position on the Appeals.
2	AI MTBL SPV v MTBL Global Fund: Breach of Contract & Frustration in Investment Redemption 21 Oct 2024 AI MTBL SPV, LLC (Claimant)Won	21 Oct 2024	AI MTBL SPV, LLC (Claimant): Judgment for ClaimantJudgment for the claimant in the amount of US$16,633,540.66, plus interest. Assumed USD, as the judgment involves US dollar amounts and the case concerns international investments.
3	Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: En Bloc Sale, Priority of Proceeds & Costs 28 Aug 2024 DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	28 Aug 2024	DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Partial success in costs applicationKiri to pay DyStar costs in the sum of S$125,705.
4	Kiri Industries v Senda International: Oppression Remedy, En Bloc Share Sale 19 May 2024 DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	19 May 2024	DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Shares to be sold en blocThe court ordered an en bloc sale of the shares in DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd.
5	Kiri Industries v DyStar: Breach of Contract, Res Judicata & Certainty of Terms 13 Apr 2023 DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent, Appellant, Plaintiff)Neutral	13 Apr 2023	DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent, Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedDyStar's appeal (CA 58) was dismissed. The court ordered both Kiri and DyStar to bear their own costs for both CA 57 and CA 58. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Tan Teck Kee v Ratan Kumar Rai: Fiduciary Duty, Director's Duties, Civil Procedure 27 Sep 2022 Ratan Kumar Rai (Respondent)Partial	27 Sep 2022	Ratan Kumar Rai (Respondent): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal dismissed regarding Suit 160, but allowed regarding SUM 2708. Costs of $60,000 (all-in) awarded to Ratan Kumar Rai.
7	Kroll v Cyberdyne Tech: Striking Out in Minority Oppression Claim 20 Sep 2022 Cyberdyne Tech Exchange Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	20 Sep 2022	Cyberdyne Tech Exchange Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application for striking out granted in partApplication for striking out granted in part; paragraphs 55 and 56 of the Statement of Claim were struck out.
8	Goh Seng Heng v Wang Xiaopu: Appeal Against Contempt of Court Sentence for Withholding Information 26 Jun 2022 Wang Xiaopu (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	26 Jun 2022	Wang Xiaopu (Respondent, Plaintiff): Sentence UpheldThe Court of Appeal upheld the sentence of seven days' imprisonment for Goh Seng Heng.
9	Wei Fengpin v Raymond Low Tuck Loong: Oppression of Minority Shareholders in Company Voluntary Winding Up 11 Apr 2022 Wei Fengpin (Appellant, Plaintiff)Won	11 Apr 2022	Wei Fengpin (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed; Low and Sim shall be jointly and severally liable to buyout Wei’s shares at US$5m.
10	Wang Xiaopu v Koh Mui Lee: Video Link Evidence & Witness Testimony 10 Mar 2022 Wang Xiaopu (Plaintiff)Lost	10 Mar 2022	Wang Xiaopu (Plaintiff): Application dismissedPlaintiff's application for leave to give evidence via video link was dismissed.
11	Ratan Kumar Rai v Seah Hock Thiam: Fiduciary Duty, Accounting, and Cambodian Land Investment 08 Dec 2021 Ratan Kumar Rai (Plaintiff)Partial	08 Dec 2021	Ratan Kumar Rai (Plaintiff): Account ordered on a wilful default basis against Mr. Tan and WorldbridgeLand (Cambodia) Co Ltd. Common account ordered against Mr. Seah. Application for declarations by Mr. Tan dismissed.Account ordered on a wilful default basis against Mr. Tan and WorldbridgeLand (Cambodia) Co Ltd. Common account ordered against Mr. Seah. Application for declarations by Mr. Tan dismissed.
12	Wei Fengpin v Raymond Low: Transfer of Oppression Action Appeal Due to Company Insolvency 06 Dec 2021 Wei Fengpin (Applicant)Neutral	06 Dec 2021	Wei Fengpin (Applicant): Appeal transferred to Court of AppealAppeal transferred from the Appellate Division to the Court of Appeal.
13	Senda International Capital v Kiri Industries: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation 11 Feb 2020 DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Partial	11 Feb 2020	DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Partial success in Suit 3Awarded 50% of the costs of its claim in Suit 3 against Kiri and Mr Manish.
14	Chee Jok Heng Stephanie v Tan Kian Meng William: Loan Recovery & Property Investment Dispute 22 Jul 2010 Tan Kian Meng William (Defendant)Won	22 Jul 2010	Tan Kian Meng William (Defendant): Counterclaim AllowedDefendant's counterclaim for return of capital and share of profit from Maplewoods was allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.