Wei Fengpin v Raymond Low: Transfer of Oppression Action Appeal Due to Company Insolvency

Wei Fengpin, Low Tuck Loong, and Sim Eng Chuan are equal shareholders of Lateral Solutions Pte Ltd. Wei commenced an oppression action against Low and Sim. Prior to trial, the company was wound up due to insolvency. The High Court found Low and Sim had acted oppressively but did not order a buyout of Wei's shares due to the company's insolvency. Wei appealed to the Appellate Division. Steven Chong JCA ordered the transfer of the appeal to the Court of Appeal, holding that the appeal arose from a case relating to the insolvency of the company, and the issues on appeal engaged the law of insolvency.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Appeal transferred from the Appellate Division to the Court of Appeal.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Appeal transfer from AD to CA ordered in oppression action where company insolvency became central. Key issue: impact of insolvency on buyout order.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Wei FengpinApplicantIndividualAppeal transferred to Court of AppealNeutral
Raymond Low Tuck LoongRespondentIndividualAppeal transferred to Court of AppealNeutral
Sim Eng ChuanRespondentIndividualAppeal transferred to Court of AppealNeutral
Lateral Solutions Pte LtdRespondentCorporationAppeal transferred to Court of AppealNeutral

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Steven ChongJustice of the Court of AppealYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. Wei, Low, and Sim are equal shareholders of Lateral Solutions Pte Ltd.
  2. Wei commenced an oppression action against Low and Sim.
  3. Low and Sim applied to wind up the company due to insolvency.
  4. A winding-up order was granted.
  5. The High Court found Low and Sim had acted oppressively.
  6. The High Court did not order a buyout due to the company's insolvency.
  7. Wei appealed the High Court's decision to the Appellate Division.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Wei Fengpin v Raymond Low Tuck Loong and others, Originating Summons No 27 of 2021, [2021] SGCA 115

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Wei commenced Suit 238 against Low and Sim under s 216 of the Companies Act.
Low and Sim applied to wind up the Company.
A winding up order was granted in HC/CWU 130/2020.
Suit 238 was scheduled for trial.
Written decision issued by the General Division of the High Court.
Wei filed an appeal against the HC Judgment to the AD.
Wei indicated it would be more appropriate for the Court of Appeal to hear the Appeal.
Case management conference convened.
Wei to confirm whether he would be applying for a transfer of the Appeal.
Wei filed the Application for a transfer of the Appeal.
Respondent’s Case was served.
Court heard the parties and ordered the transfer of the appeal.
Detailed grounds issued.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Transfer of Appeal
    • Outcome: The Court of Appeal ordered the transfer of the appeal from the Appellate Division to the Court of Appeal.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Appropriate appellate court
      • Interpretation of Sixth Schedule to the SCJA
    • Related Cases:
      • [2021] 2 SLR 440
  2. Appropriateness of Buyout Order
    • Outcome: The court did not rule on the appropriateness of the buyout order, as the issue was not before them. The court transferred the appeal to the Court of Appeal.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Impact of company insolvency on buyout order
      • Shareholder contribution to insolvency
    • Related Cases:
      • [2021] SGHC 90

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Buyout of shares

9. Cause of Actions

  • Oppression Action

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Insolvency Litigation

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Noor Azlin bte Abdul Rahman and another v Changi General Hospital Pte LtdCourt of AppealYes[2021] 2 SLR 440SingaporeCited to provide guidance to assist litigants to properly navigate the new appellate regime.
Wei Fengpin v Low Tuck Loong Raymond and othersHigh CourtYes[2021] SGHC 90SingaporeThe judgment under appeal. Findings of oppression but refusal to order buyout due to insolvency.
DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Kiri Industries Ltd and others and another suitHigh CourtYes[2018] 5 SLR 1SingaporeCited for the principle that a buyout order helps the oppressed shareholder realise his investment in the company at a fair value and to exit the company.
In re London School of Electronics LtdChancery DivisionYes[1986] Ch 211England and WalesForeign authority governing issues of buyout orders in respect of a company put into liquidation.
Grace v Biagioli and othersEngland and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division)Yes[2005] EWCA Civ 1222England and WalesForeign authority governing issues of buyout orders in respect of a company put into liquidation.
Re Via Servis Ltd Skala v Via Sevis Ltd and anotherHigh Court of JusticeYes[2014] EWHC 3069 (Ch)England and WalesForeign authority governing issues of buyout orders in respect of a company put into liquidation.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
Rules of Court (2014 Rev Ed)
O 56A r 12(3) of the ROC
O 56A r 12(4) of the ROC
O 56A r 12(5) of the ROC

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Supreme Court of Judicature ActSingapore
Companies Act (Cap 50, 2006 Rev Ed)Singapore
s 216 of the Companies Act (Cap 50, 2006 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Oppression
  • Buyout order
  • Insolvency
  • Winding up
  • Appellate Division
  • Court of Appeal
  • Transfer of appeal
  • Sixth Schedule
  • Shareholder
  • Companies Act

15.2 Keywords

  • Oppression action
  • Company insolvency
  • Appeal transfer
  • Singapore Court of Appeal

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Civil Procedure
  • Company Law
  • Insolvency Law