Joana Lee

Joana Lee is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and non-compete agreement.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Joana Lee has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and commercial disputes.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Joana Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joana Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joana Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Riddick principle	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joana Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joana Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Interlocutory injunction	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Joana Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joana Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joana Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Non-Compete Agreement	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joana Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Confidentiality Agreement	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joana Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Joana Lee has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Bih Li & Lee	1 cases	100% of cases	Littau v Astrata: Interim Injunction & Non-Compete Agreement Dispute(Dec 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Joana Lee's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Joana Lee's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Littau v Astrata: Interim Injunction & Non-Compete Agreement Dispute 09 Dec 2010 Littau Robin Duane (Plaintiff)Partial	09 Dec 2010	Littau Robin Duane (Plaintiff): Orders granted to the defendant were ordered to stand, except for the part of paragraph 2 that allowed the defendant to use the information and documents disclosed or produced pursuant to the search orders for purposes of any claim against the plaintiff as well as the Tridex Companies in and outside Singapore.Plaintiff's application to set aside the orders was largely dismissed. The court ordered costs at 90% to be paid by the plaintiff to the defendant, the deduction of 10% being the costs attributed to the arguments on the Riddick principle. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.