Joel Wee Tze Sing

Joel Wee Tze Sing is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in trust law and litigation. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 67% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Joel Wee Tze Sing has demonstrated expertise across 42 primary practice areas, with significant experience in property law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Property Law	5 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Joel Wee Tze Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Joel Wee Tze Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Joel Wee Tze Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Joel Wee Tze Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Laches	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joel Wee Tze Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Joel Wee Tze Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Limitation	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joel Wee Tze Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Acquiescence	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Joel Wee Tze Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Joel Wee Tze Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joel Wee Tze Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joel Wee Tze Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trusts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joel Wee Tze Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joel Wee Tze Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Joel Wee Tze Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joel Wee Tze Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joel Wee Tze Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Joel Wee Tze Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joel Wee Tze Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joel Wee Tze Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joel Wee Tze Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joel Wee Tze Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Joel Wee Tze Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constructive trusts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Joel Wee Tze Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joel Wee Tze Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joel Wee Tze Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joel Wee Tze Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joel Wee Tze Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Presumed Resulting Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Joel Wee Tze Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joel Wee Tze Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Common Intention Constructive Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joel Wee Tze Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Joel Wee Tze Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building Management	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joel Wee Tze Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Joel Wee Tze Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Choice of jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joel Wee Tze Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Joel Wee Tze Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joel Wee Tze Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joel Wee Tze Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Joel Wee Tze Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Joel Wee Tze Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joel Wee Tze Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joel Wee Tze Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Joel Wee Tze Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Joel Wee Tze Sing has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
CNPLaw LLP	3 cases	50% of cases	Salaya Kalairani v Appangam Govindhasamy: Resulting Trusts, Constructive Trusts, Acquiescence, Laches, and Limitation Act(Dec 2023) Appangam Govindhasamy v Salaya Kalairani: Resulting & Constructive Trusts Dispute Over Shophouse(Apr 2023) Changi Makan v Development 2003: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Conspiracy in Property Sale(Feb 2020)
Tan Peng Chin LLC	2 cases	33% of cases	Trisuryo Garuda Nusa v SKP Pradiksi: Choice of Jurisdiction & Forum Non Conveniens(Aug 2017) Seng You Morris v International Bank of Qatar: Taxation of Costs Dispute(Feb 2016)
Colin Ng & Partners LLP	1 cases	17% of cases	Sit Kwong Lam v Management Corporation: Strata Title, Common Property Dispute(Mar 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Joel Wee Tze Sing's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.3
Complex Cases: 4 (67%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	15.0 parties avg	5.0	17%
Lost	15.0 parties avg	5.0	17%
Partial	15.0 parties avg	5.0	17%
Won	33.7 parties avg	3.7	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2023	25.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Joel Wee Tze Sing's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(17%)	17%
Lost	1(17%)	17%
Partial	1(17%)	17%
Won	3(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	41,000.00	13,666.673 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Salaya Kalairani v Appangam Govindhasamy: Resulting Trusts, Constructive Trusts, Acquiescence, Laches, and Limitation Act 06 Dec 2023 Salaya Kalairani (legal representative of the estate of Tey Siew Choon, deceased) (Appellant, Respondent)Partial	06 Dec 2023	Salaya Kalairani (legal representative of the estate of Tey Siew Choon, deceased) (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal dismissed in part. Kalairani was ordered to account to the plaintiffs for rent received from the Property from 24 September 2015, and to pay to the plaintiffs half of the rent after deduction of reasonable expenses in respect of the Property and the rental thereof. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Appangam Govindhasamy v Salaya Kalairani: Resulting & Constructive Trusts Dispute Over Shophouse 05 Apr 2023 Salaya Kalairani (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim)Lost	05 Apr 2023	Salaya Kalairani (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim): Counterclaim dismissedThe defendants' counterclaim that TG held his half-share on trust for Tey's estate was dismissed.
3	Changi Makan v Development 2003: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Conspiracy in Property Sale 06 Feb 2020 Changi Makan Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Dismissed	06 Feb 2020	Changi Makan Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim against the defendants was dismissed.
4	Sit Kwong Lam v Management Corporation: Strata Title, Common Property Dispute 04 Mar 2018 MANAGEMENT CORPORATION STRATA TITLE PLAN NO 2645 (Respondent)Won	04 Mar 2018	MANAGEMENT CORPORATION STRATA TITLE PLAN NO 2645 (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed and costs of the appeal awarded to the Respondent fixed at $40,000, inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Trisuryo Garuda Nusa v SKP Pradiksi: Choice of Jurisdiction & Forum Non Conveniens 17 Aug 2017 Southern Realty (Malaya) Sdn Bhd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Won	17 Aug 2017	Southern Realty (Malaya) Sdn Bhd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal AllowedAppeal against the decision to stay proceedings in S 349 was allowed.
6	Seng You Morris v International Bank of Qatar: Taxation of Costs Dispute 21 Feb 2016 International Bank of Qatar (Respondent)Won	21 Feb 2016	International Bank of Qatar (Respondent): WonThe respondent successfully defended the application for review of taxation order and was awarded costs of $1,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.