John Lu Zhuoren

John Lu Zhuoren is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in misuse of drugs act and abuse of process. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

John Lu Zhuoren has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	9 cases	18% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	John Lu Zhuoren has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	5 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	John Lu Zhuoren has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	5 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	John Lu Zhuoren has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	John Lu Zhuoren has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	John Lu Zhuoren has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	John Lu Zhuoren has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	John Lu Zhuoren has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	John Lu Zhuoren has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	John Lu Zhuoren has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	John Lu Zhuoren has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	John Lu Zhuoren has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	John Lu Zhuoren has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Public Order Offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	John Lu Zhuoren has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	John Lu Zhuoren has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	John Lu Zhuoren has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Freedom of speech	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	John Lu Zhuoren has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Public Order Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	John Lu Zhuoren has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	John Lu Zhuoren has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Consent of Public Prosecutor	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	John Lu Zhuoren has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Public Order	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	John Lu Zhuoren has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	John Lu Zhuoren has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	John Lu Zhuoren has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

John Lu Zhuoren has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	6 cases	67% of cases	Iskandar v Attorney General: Constitutionality of CPC Cost Provisions & Right to Counsel(Aug 2022) PP v Chandroo Subramaniam: Trafficking Cannabis under Misuse of Drugs Act(Sep 2020) Public Prosecutor v Azahari bin Ahmad: Drug Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act(May 2016)
Public Prosecutor	2 cases	22% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Fauzi Bin Sanusi: Importation of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Aug 2018) Public Prosecutor v Wilkinson: Importation of Diamorphine & Misuse of Drugs Act(Dec 2009)
Prosecution	1 cases	11% of cases	PP v Ong Seow Ping & Abdul Rahim: Trafficking of Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act(Apr 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of John Lu Zhuoren's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 8.3
Complex Cases: 3 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	98.3 parties avg	8.3	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2011	27.0 parties avg	7.0
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2020	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2022	126.0 parties avg	26.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of John Lu Zhuoren's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	9(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Iskandar v Attorney General: Constitutionality of CPC Cost Provisions & Right to Counsel 03 Aug 2022 Government of Singapore (Respondent, Defendant)Won	03 Aug 2022	Government of Singapore (Respondent, Defendant): Judgment for RespondentThe appeal was dismissed in favor of the Government of Singapore.
2	PP v Chandroo Subramaniam: Trafficking Cannabis under Misuse of Drugs Act 30 Sep 2020 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	30 Sep 2020	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for the ProsecutionAll three accused persons were convicted of their respective charges.
3	Public Prosecutor v Fauzi Bin Sanusi: Importation of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 05 Aug 2018 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	05 Aug 2018	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe accused was found guilty and sentenced to life imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane.
4	PP v Ong Seow Ping & Abdul Rahim: Trafficking of Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act 05 Apr 2018 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	05 Apr 2018	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe Prosecution successfully convicted both accused persons on charges of possessing diamorphine for the purpose of trafficking.
5	Public Prosecutor v Azahari bin Ahmad: Drug Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act 22 May 2016 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	22 May 2016	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Conviction of both accused personsThe Public Prosecutor secured the conviction of both accused persons on charges of drug trafficking.
6	Yap Keng Ho v PP: Assembly & Procession Without Permit Near Parliament House 21 Feb 2011 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	21 Feb 2011	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeals against conviction and sentence dismissed.
7	Chee Soon Juan v PP: Freedom of Speech & Public Entertainment Licence 19 Jan 2011 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	19 Jan 2011	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; original conviction and sentence upheld. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Public Prosecutor v Chong Kai Xiong: Freedom of Assembly and Procession 31 Mar 2010 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	31 Mar 2010	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed and the orders for acquittal against all five respondents are set aside.
9	Public Prosecutor v Wilkinson: Importation of Diamorphine & Misuse of Drugs Act 28 Dec 2009 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	28 Dec 2009	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): ConvictionThe accused was convicted of importing diamorphine.