Public Prosecutor v Wilkinson: Importation of Diamorphine & Misuse of Drugs Act

In Public Prosecutor v Wilkinson a/l Primus, the High Court of Singapore convicted Wilkinson a/l Primus on December 29, 2009, for importing not less than 35.66 grams of diamorphine into Singapore, in violation of the Misuse of Drugs Act. The court found that Wilkinson either knew or chose not to know that he was importing a controlled drug, thereby failing to rebut the presumption of knowledge under the Act. The mandatory death sentence was pronounced.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Convicted

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Wilkinson was convicted of importing diamorphine into Singapore, violating the Misuse of Drugs Act. The court found he knew or chose not to know about the drugs.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorProsecutionGovernment AgencyConvictionWonGillian Koh, John Lu ZhuoRen
Wilkinson a/l PrimusDefendantIndividualConvictedLostShashi Nathan, Tania Chin, Jeeva Joethy

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Tay Yong KwangJudgeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Gillian KohPublic Prosecutor
John Lu ZhuoRenPublic Prosecutor
Shashi NathanHarry Elias Partnership
Tania ChinHarry Elias Partnership
Jeeva JoethyJoethy & Co

4. Facts

  1. The accused was found to be carrying a bundle containing not less than 35.66 grams of diamorphine.
  2. The accused was arrested at Woodlands Checkpoint after arriving from Johor Baru on a motorcycle.
  3. The accused initially claimed he did not know what was in the bundle.
  4. The accused later claimed he was told the package contained Chinese medicine.
  5. The accused was to deliver the bundle to a carpark near a McDonald’s restaurant.
  6. The accused admitted to lying to CNB officers about not knowing the contents of the package.
  7. The accused was promised RM2,000 for delivering the package.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Public Prosecutor v Wilkinson a/l Primus, CC 42/2009, [2009] SGHC 289

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Accused born
Accused imported drugs into Singapore
Accused arrested at Woodlands Checkpoint
Judgment issued

7. Legal Issues

  1. Importation of Controlled Drugs
    • Outcome: The court found the accused guilty of importing a controlled drug.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • [1993] 1 SLR 961
      • [2008] 1 SLR 1
  2. Knowledge of Importing Controlled Drugs
    • Outcome: The court found that the accused either knew or chose not to know that he was importing a controlled drug, failing to rebut the presumption of knowledge.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • [2008] 1 SLR 1

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Conviction
  2. Mandatory Death Sentence

9. Cause of Actions

  • Violation of Section 7 of the Misuse of Drugs Act

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Litigation
  • Drug Offences

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Tse Po Chung Nathan & Anor v PPCourt of AppealYes[1993] 1 SLR 961SingaporeCited to support the application of the definition of 'import' from the Interpretation Act to the Misuse of Drugs Act.
Tan Kiam Peng v PPCourt of AppealYes[2008] 1 SLR 1SingaporeCited for the exposition on wilful blindness.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Misuse of Drugs Act, Cap 185, section 7Singapore
Misuse of Drugs Act, section 33Singapore
Misuse of Drugs Act, section 18(2)Singapore
Criminal Procedure Code, section 122(6)Singapore
Interpretation Act (Cap 1), section 2Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Diamorphine
  • Importation
  • Misuse of Drugs Act
  • Woodlands Checkpoint
  • Wilful Blindness
  • Presumption of Knowledge

15.2 Keywords

  • Diamorphine
  • Drug Importation
  • Singapore Law
  • Misuse of Drugs Act
  • Criminal
  • Drugs

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Drug Trafficking

17. Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law
  • Statutory Offences
  • Misuse of Drugs Act