Jonathan Wong

Jonathan Wong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2012 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 29.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 14% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jonathan Wong has demonstrated expertise across 29 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	4 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Jonathan Wong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Jonathan Wong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jonathan Wong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jonathan Wong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Jonathan Wong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jonathan Wong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jonathan Wong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jonathan Wong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jonathan Wong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jonathan Wong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jonathan Wong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jonathan Wong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jonathan Wong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jonathan Wong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Letter of Credit Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jonathan Wong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jonathan Wong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Substituted Service	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jonathan Wong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Examination of judgment debtor	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jonathan Wong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jonathan Wong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jonathan Wong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Jonathan Wong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jonathan Wong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Drug Offences	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jonathan Wong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jonathan Wong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jonathan Wong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jonathan Wong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jonathan Wong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jonathan Wong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jonathan Wong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jonathan Wong has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tito Isaac & Co LLP	4 cases	57% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Azahari bin Ahmad: Drug Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act(May 2016) Vasentha v PP: Trafficking, Diamorphine, Sentencing Principles(Jul 2015) D’Rozario Pancratius Joseph v Public Prosecutor: Dangerous Driving & Rash Act Causing Death/Hurt(Feb 2015)
Rajah & Tann LLP	2 cases	29% of cases	Abani Trading v BNP Paribas: Letter of Credit Compliance & Bank's Duty of Care(Jun 2014) Burgundy Global v Transocean: Damages for Breach of Contract & EJD Order Jurisdiction(May 2014)
Tembusu Law LLC	1 cases	14% of cases	WXW v WXX: Division of Matrimonial Assets in Long Single-Income Marriage(Jun 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jonathan Wong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 1 (14%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.5 parties avg	2.5	29%
Partial	32.7 parties avg	2.7	43%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	29%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2015	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jonathan Wong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(29%)	29%
Partial	3(43%)	43%
Won	2(29%)	29%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3,118,193.68	1,559,096.842 cases	2
USD	55,001.46	55,001.461 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2015	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	WXW v WXX: Division of Matrimonial Assets in Long Single-Income Marriage 23 Jun 2024 WXX (Defendant)Partial	23 Jun 2024	WXX (Defendant): Division of matrimonial assets 40:60 against himThe Husband is entitled to S$3,118,193.68, representing 40% of the matrimonial assets. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Public Prosecutor v Azahari bin Ahmad: Drug Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act 22 May 2016 Azahari bin Ahmad (Defendant)Lost	22 May 2016	Azahari bin Ahmad (Defendant): Convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment and caningThe First Accused was convicted of drug trafficking and sentenced to life imprisonment with the mandatory minimum caning of 15 strokes.
3	Vasentha v PP: Trafficking, Diamorphine, Sentencing Principles 28 Jul 2015 Vasentha d/o Joseph (Appellant)Won	28 Jul 2015	Vasentha d/o Joseph (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal against the sentence was allowed, and the sentence of imprisonment was reduced to a term of 8 years.
4	D’Rozario Pancratius Joseph v Public Prosecutor: Dangerous Driving & Rash Act Causing Death/Hurt 10 Feb 2015 D'Rozario Pancratius Joseph (Appellant)Partial	10 Feb 2015	D'Rozario Pancratius Joseph (Appellant): Appeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against sentence allowed in part.Appeal against conviction dismissed. Appeal against sentence for the s 66 RTA offence allowed, reducing imprisonment to 9 weeks. Appeal against sentence for the s 337(a) Penal Code offence dismissed.
5	Abani Trading v BNP Paribas: Letter of Credit Compliance & Bank's Duty of Care 05 Jun 2014 BNP Paribas (Defendant, Respondent)Won	05 Jun 2014	BNP Paribas (Defendant, Respondent): Costs awarded on an indemnity basisBNP Paribas was awarded costs on an indemnity basis. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
6	Burgundy Global v Transocean: Damages for Breach of Contract & EJD Order Jurisdiction 13 May 2014 Transocean Offshore International Ventures Ltd (Respondent)Partial	13 May 2014	Transocean Offshore International Ventures Ltd (Respondent): Partial JudgmentPartial judgment for Transocean; damages awarded in the amount of $55,001.46 (assumed USD, as the judgment refers to US dollar amounts and the respondent is listed on the New York Stock Exchange).
7	Kim Gwang Seok v Public Prosecutor: Video-Link Testimony for Overseas Witnesses in Drug Export Conspiracy Case 08 Mar 2012 Kim Gwang Seok (Applicant)Lost	08 Mar 2012	Kim Gwang Seok (Applicant): Motion DismissedThe applicant's motion to allow witnesses to testify via video-link was dismissed.