Kim Gwang Seok v Public Prosecutor: Video-Link Testimony for Overseas Witnesses in Drug Export Conspiracy Case

In Kim Gwang Seok v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of Singapore addressed a criminal motion by Kim Gwang Seok, who sought permission for five Korean nationals to testify via video-link from Korea in his trial for conspiracy to export diamorphine. The court, presided over by Justice Tay Yong Kwang, dismissed the motion, holding that Singapore law, specifically the Criminal Procedure Code, does not permit overseas witnesses to testify via video-link in criminal proceedings. The court also noted that the personal and financial difficulties cited by the witnesses did not appear insurmountable.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Criminal Motion dismissed.

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

The High Court denied Kim Gwang Seok's motion to allow Korean witnesses to testify via video-link in his drug export conspiracy trial, citing restrictions in Singapore law.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorRespondentGovernment AgencyMotion OpposedWon
Gordon Oh of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Jean Chan of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Eunice Ng of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Kim Gwang SeokApplicantIndividualMotion DismissedLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Tay Yong KwangJudgeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Gordon OhAttorney-General’s Chambers
Jean ChanAttorney-General’s Chambers
Eunice NgAttorney-General’s Chambers
Jonathan WongTito Isaac & Co LLP
Tito IsaacTito Isaac & Co LLP

4. Facts

  1. Kim was charged with conspiring to export diamorphine from Singapore to Australia.
  2. The alleged offence occurred on 30 August 2009.
  3. Kim claimed he was asked to carry credit card computer chips in shoes.
  4. Kim stated he and a friend believed he was carrying computer chips, not diamorphine.
  5. Five Korean nationals were proposed as witnesses to support Kim's claim.
  6. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade of Korea agreed to bear the costs of video-link testimony.
  7. One witness was in custody in Korea, and others cited personal/financial reasons for not traveling.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Kim Gwang Seok v Public Prosecutor, Criminal Motion No. 88 of 2011/H, [2012] SGHC 51

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Offence committed: Diamorphine export conspiracy.
Criminal Case No. 45 of 2011 filed.
Criminal Motion No. 88 of 2011 filed.
Judgment issued.
Witness (c) expected to deliver first child.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Admissibility of Video-Link Testimony from Overseas Witnesses in Criminal Proceedings
    • Outcome: The court held that Singapore law does not permit overseas witnesses to testify via video-link in criminal proceedings.
    • Category: Procedural

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Order to allow witnesses to testify via video-link

9. Cause of Actions

  • Conspiracy to export diamorphine

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Law
  • Appeals

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
N/AHigh CourtYesN/ASingaporeThe Nepalese man involved in the conspiracy pleaded guilty to a non-capital charge and was sentenced.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Misuse of Drugs Act (Cap 185)Singapore
Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68, 1985 Ed)Singapore
Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68, 1985 Ed) s 364ASingapore
Criminal Procedure Code (2010 Ed)Singapore
Criminal Procedure Code (2010 Ed) s 281(1)Singapore
Evidence Act (Cap 97, 1997 Rev Ed)Singapore
Evidence Act (Cap 97, 1997 Rev Ed) s 62A(1)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Video-link testimony
  • Diamorphine
  • Conspiracy
  • Misuse of Drugs Act
  • Overseas witnesses
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Evidence Act

15.2 Keywords

  • Video-link
  • Witness
  • Criminal
  • Procedure
  • Diamorphine
  • Singapore
  • Korea
  • Evidence

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Criminal Procedure
  • Evidence
  • Drug Trafficking