Jonathan Yang

Jonathan Yang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in adjudication and architects and engineers liability. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jonathan Yang has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	2 cases	17% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jonathan Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	17% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jonathan Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	17% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Jonathan Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Jonathan Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Dispute Resolution	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jonathan Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Adjudication	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jonathan Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Professional Negligence	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jonathan Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Architects and Engineers Liability	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jonathan Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jonathan Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jonathan Yang has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
TSMP Law Corporation	2 cases	100% of cases	Motor Image v SCDA: Dispute over Architect Fees under SIA Conditions of Appointment(Sep 2010) Chip Hup Hup Kee Construction v Ssangyong: Setting Aside Adjudication Determination Under SOP Act(Nov 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jonathan Yang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jonathan Yang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	463,335.00	463,335.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Motor Image v SCDA: Dispute over Architect Fees under SIA Conditions of Appointment 16 Sep 2010 SCDA Architects Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	16 Sep 2010	SCDA Architects Pte Ltd (Respondent): Judgment upheldArbitration award in favor of SCDA Architects upheld. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
2	Chip Hup Hup Kee Construction v Ssangyong: Setting Aside Adjudication Determination Under SOP Act 25 Nov 2009 Chip Hup Hup Kee Construction Pte Ltd (Claimant, Applicant)Won	25 Nov 2009	Chip Hup Hup Kee Construction Pte Ltd (Claimant, Applicant): Application to set aside the Unsigned Adjudication Determination dismissedThe Respondent's application to set aside the Unsigned Adjudication Determination was dismissed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.