Josephine Choo Poh Hua

Josephine Choo Poh Hua is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in injunctions and credit and security.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Josephine Choo Poh Hua has demonstrated expertise across 12 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and injunctions.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Josephine Choo Poh Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Josephine Choo Poh Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Construction Contracts	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Josephine Choo Poh Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Josephine Choo Poh Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Josephine Choo Poh Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Josephine Choo Poh Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Incorporation by reference	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Josephine Choo Poh Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Josephine Choo Poh Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Josephine Choo Poh Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Josephine Choo Poh Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Banker's Guarantee	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Josephine Choo Poh Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Josephine Choo Poh Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Josephine Choo Poh Hua has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	2 cases	100% of cases	Bintai Kindenko v Samsung C&T: Performance Bond Call & Unconscionability Exception(May 2019) Bintai Kindenko v Samsung C&T: Interlocutory Injunction on Banker's Guarantee & Exclusion Clauses(Sep 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Josephine Choo Poh Hua's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.0 parties avg	3.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Josephine Choo Poh Hua's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	30,000.00	30,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Bintai Kindenko v Samsung C&T: Performance Bond Call & Unconscionability Exception 29 May 2019 Bintai Kindenko Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	29 May 2019	Bintai Kindenko Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Appellant to pay the First Respondent’s costs fixed at $30,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore), which included the disbursements and the costs of the application to the Court of Appeal for leave to appeal.
2	Bintai Kindenko v Samsung C&T: Interlocutory Injunction on Banker's Guarantee & Exclusion Clauses 02 Sep 2018 Bintai Kindenko Private Limited (Plaintiff)Lost	02 Sep 2018	Bintai Kindenko Private Limited (Plaintiff): Injunction dischargedThe court discharged the interim injunction restraining the 2nd defendant from paying out on a banker’s guarantee issued in favour of the 1st defendant and to prevent the 1st defendant from receiving payment of the same.