Josh Tan

Josh Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and fiduciary duties. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Josh Tan has demonstrated expertise across 16 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil practice and fiduciary duties.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Practice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Josh Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Josh Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Josh Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Josh Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Josh Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Josh Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Josh Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Failure of consideration	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Josh Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Josh Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Josh Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Josh Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Josh Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Josh Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Josh Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Josh Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Dishonest assistance	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Josh Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Josh Tan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	2 cases	100% of cases	Epoch Minerals Pte Ltd v Raffles Asset Management: Cost Allocation in Fraudulent Inducement Case(Jan 2022) Epoch Minerals v Raffles Asset Management: Conspiracy, Dishonest Assistance, and Misrepresentation in US$10M Loan Agreement(Dec 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Josh Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 2 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	15.0 parties avg	5.0	50%
Neutral	15.0 parties avg	5.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2022	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Josh Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Neutral	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
USD	700,000.00	700,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Epoch Minerals Pte Ltd v Raffles Asset Management: Cost Allocation in Fraudulent Inducement Case 27 Jan 2022 Gangadhara Brhmendra Srikanth Maroju (Defendant)Neutral	27 Jan 2022	Gangadhara Brhmendra Srikanth Maroju (Defendant): No costs awarded againstNo costs awarded against this defendant.
2	Epoch Minerals v Raffles Asset Management: Conspiracy, Dishonest Assistance, and Misrepresentation in US$10M Loan Agreement 16 Dec 2021 Gangadhara Brhmendra Srikanth Maroju (Defendant)Lost	16 Dec 2021	Gangadhara Brhmendra Srikanth Maroju (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the second, third, and fourth defendants for a total of US$700,000.