Joy Tan

Joy Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in shares and fiduciary duties. Their track record shows a 38.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Joy Tan has demonstrated expertise across 44 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Joy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Company Law	6 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Joy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Joy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Shares	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Joy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Joy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Joy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Joy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Joy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Valuation of Shares	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Joy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Joy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Joy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Joy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equity and limitation of actions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Revenue Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Income taxation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Valuation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Joy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interlocutory injunction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpleader	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Joint and Several Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Joy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Discount on minority shares	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restrictive Covenant	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Joy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Garden Leave	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Joy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bunker Trading	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Protection	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equitable Compensation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Joy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Joy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trade Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Joy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Joy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Joy Tan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	7 cases	88% of cases	Thio Syn Pyn v Thio Syn Kym Wendy: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation(Mar 2019) Thio Syn Kym Wendy v Thio Syn Pyn: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation in Malaysia Dairy Industries(Mar 2018) Dynasty Line Ltd v Sukamto Sia: Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Equitable Compensation(Sep 2016)
Wong Partnership	1 cases	13% of cases	Tan Cheong Leong v Lim Chun Chuan: Trust, Joint Accounts & Directors' Duties(Sep 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Joy Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 8.2
Complex Cases: 4 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	411.3 parties avg	11.3	50%
Partial	19.0 parties avg	9.0	13%
Won	34.0 parties avg	4.0	38%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	119.0 parties avg	19.0
2011	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	19.0 parties avg	9.0
2019	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Joy Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(50%)	50%
Partial	1(13%)	13%
Won	3(38%)	38%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
HKD	13,139,273.78	6,569,636.892 cases	2
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Thio Syn Pyn v Thio Syn Kym Wendy: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation 26 Mar 2019 Thio Syn San Serene (Respondent)Won	26 Mar 2019	Thio Syn San Serene (Respondent): Appeal UpheldAppeal upheld; costs of $28,000 (all-in) were to be paid by each Appellant to the Respondents. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Thio Syn Kym Wendy v Thio Syn Pyn: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation in Malaysia Dairy Industries 12 Mar 2018 Thio Syn San Serene (Plaintiff)Partial	12 Mar 2018	Thio Syn San Serene (Plaintiff): Shares to be bought out without minority discountCourt ordered that no minority discount be applied to the sale of the plaintiff's shares in Malaysia Dairy Industries Pte Ltd. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Dynasty Line Ltd v Sukamto Sia: Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Equitable Compensation 08 Sep 2016 Lee Howe Yong (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	08 Sep 2016	Lee Howe Yong (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed. Lee and Sia should be jointly and severally liable for the sum of HKD6,569,636.89 plus post-judgment pre-liquidation and post-liquidation interest in respect of the Commerzbank pledge.
4	Dynasty Line Ltd v Sukamto Sia: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Director Liability 05 Nov 2015 Lee Howe Yong (Defendant)Lost	05 Nov 2015	Lee Howe Yong (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against Lee for HK$6,569,636.89 jointly and severally with Sia for the Commerzbank Pledge, plus pre-liquidation interest of 5% per annum over four years. Post-liquidation interest will only be claimable if Dynasty has a surplus of assets after paying all claims in its liquidation. Assumed HKD as the case was heard in relation to CDC shares, a company listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.
5	MF Global Singapore v Vintage Bullion: Proprietary Claims in Liquidation 24 Jun 2015 Vintage Bullion DMCC (In its own capacity, and for and on behalf of and as representative of all customers of MF Global Singapore Pte Limited (In Creditors' Voluntary Liquidation) who have LFX Claims for Profit (as defined in the Originating Summons filed herein) and/or Bullion Claims for Profit (as defined in the Originating Summons filed herein) (Defendant)Lost	24 Jun 2015	Vintage Bullion DMCC (In its own capacity, and for and on behalf of and as representative of all customers of MF Global Singapore Pte Limited (In Creditors' Voluntary Liquidation) who have LFX Claims for Profit (as defined in the Originating Summons filed herein) and/or Bullion Claims for Profit (as defined in the Originating Summons filed herein) (Defendant): LostJudgment in favor of the Liquidators on the substantive issues.
6	A/S Dan-Bunkering Ltd v Tan Chee Hiong Alan: Restrictive Covenant & Injunction in Bunker Trading 17 Jul 2012 Tan Chee Hiong Alan (Defendant, Applicant)Won	17 Jul 2012	Tan Chee Hiong Alan (Defendant, Applicant): Application to discharge injunction allowedThe defendant's application to discharge the ex parte injunction was allowed. No monetary amount was specified. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Hashu Dhalomal Shahdadpuri: Conspiracy & MTIC Fraud 28 Jun 2011 Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs (Appellant)Won	28 Jun 2011	Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe court allowed the appeal and set aside the Judge’s decision to strike out the Appellant’s claim.
8	Tan Cheong Leong v Lim Chun Chuan: Trust, Joint Accounts & Directors' Duties 23 Sep 2001 Hiap Lee Housing Developing Sdn Bhd (Defendant)Lost	23 Sep 2001	Hiap Lee Housing Developing Sdn Bhd (Defendant): Application to amend Statement of Claim was dismissed.Application by the 15th, 16th and 17th defendants to amend their Statement of Claim was dismissed.