A/S Dan-Bunkering Ltd v Tan Chee Hiong Alan: Restrictive Covenant & Injunction in Bunker Trading

In A/S Dan-Bunkering Ltd v Tan Chee Hiong Alan, the High Court of Singapore heard an application by Tan Chee Hiong Alan to discharge an ex parte injunction obtained by A/S Dan-Bunkering Ltd. The injunction prohibited Tan from working for a competitor, Chemoil, based on a restrictive covenant in his employment contract. The court allowed Tan's application, finding that A/S Dan-Bunkering Ltd had not demonstrated irreparable harm. The court also dismissed A/S Dan-Bunkering Ltd's application for leave to appeal.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Defendant's application to discharge the ex parte injunction was allowed, and the plaintiff's application for leave to appeal was dismissed.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

The High Court discharged an ex parte injunction against Tan Chee Hiong Alan, a former bunkering executive, finding that the plaintiff A/S Dan-Bunkering Ltd did not demonstrate irreparable harm.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
A/S Dan-Bunkering LtdPlaintiffCorporationApplication to discharge injunction allowed, Application for leave to appeal dismissedLost, LostDanny Ong Tun Wei, Lau Kah Hee
Tan Chee Hiong AlanDefendant, ApplicantIndividualApplication to discharge injunction allowedWonJoy Tan, Yuwen Teo-McDonnell, Sim Mei Ling

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Choo Han TeckJYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Danny Ong Tun WeiRajah & Tann LLP
Lau Kah HeeRajah & Tann LLP
Joy TanWongPartnership LLP
Yuwen Teo-McDonnellWongPartnership LLP
Sim Mei LingWongPartnership LLP

4. Facts

  1. The defendant was employed by the plaintiff as a marketing executive and later as a Bunkering Executive.
  2. The defendant signed a contract with a restrictive covenant clause preventing him from joining a competitor for one year after leaving the plaintiff's employment.
  3. The defendant resigned from the plaintiff's company and was placed on garden leave.
  4. The defendant signed a contract with Chemoil, a competitor of the plaintiff.
  5. The plaintiff obtained an ex parte injunction to prevent the defendant from working for Chemoil.
  6. The defendant applied to discharge the ex parte injunction.

5. Formal Citations

  1. A/S Dan-Bunkering Ltd v Tan Chee Hiong Alan, Suit No 413 of 2012 (Summons No 2110 of 2012), [2012] SGHC 145

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Defendant employed by plaintiff as marketing executive
Defendant appointed as Bunkering Executive in Shanghai office
Defendant signed contract with restrictive covenant clause
Defendant resigned
Plaintiff obtained ex parte injunction
Defendant applied to discharge injunction
Defendant's application allowed; ex parte injunction set aside
Decision Date

7. Legal Issues

  1. Discharge of Injunction
    • Outcome: The court allowed the defendant's application to discharge the ex parte injunction.
    • Category: Procedural
  2. Enforceability of Restrictive Covenant
    • Outcome: The court determined that the issue of whether the restrictive clause applies as strictly and narrowly as the plaintiff contended is best settled at trial.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Injunction

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Contract

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation

11. Industries

  • Bunker Trading

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
No cited cases

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
No applicable statutes

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Restrictive covenant
  • Ex parte injunction
  • Bunker trading
  • Garden leave
  • Irreparable harm

15.2 Keywords

  • injunction
  • restrictive covenant
  • bunker trading
  • employment
  • singapore

16. Subjects

  • Contract Dispute
  • Employment Dispute
  • Injunctions

17. Areas of Law

  • Contract Law
  • Injunctions
  • Employment Law