Julian Soong

Julian Soong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2005 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in injunctions and without prejudice privilege. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Julian Soong has demonstrated expertise across 30 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and fiduciary duties.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Julian Soong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Julian Soong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Julian Soong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Julian Soong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Julian Soong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Julian Soong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Julian Soong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Julian Soong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Julian Soong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Julian Soong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Julian Soong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Julian Soong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Julian Soong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Julian Soong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Julian Soong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Without Prejudice Privilege	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Julian Soong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Anton Piller Order	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Julian Soong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Julian Soong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Electronic Discovery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Julian Soong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Julian Soong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Julian Soong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Julian Soong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Julian Soong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Julian Soong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Julian Soong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Julian Soong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Julian Soong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Julian Soong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Julian Soong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Julian Soong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Julian Soong has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann	3 cases	50% of cases	Sin Lian Heng Construction v Singapore Telecommunications: Admissibility of 'Without Prejudice' Communications(Feb 2007) Teo Chin Kiang Willie v MAE Engineering Ltd: Unlawful Termination, Breach of Contract, Director's Duties, and Negligence Claims(Jun 2006) CHS CPO GmbH v Vikas Goel: Discharge of Anton Piller & Mareva Injunctions for Fraud & Asset Dissipation(Mar 2006)
Rajah & Tann LLP	2 cases	33% of cases	Sin Lian Heng Construction v. Singapore Telecommunications: Breach of Contract & Cable Recovery Dispute(Aug 2010) Deutsche Bank v Chang Tse Wen: Electronic Discovery Protocol Dispute in Loan Recovery(Apr 2010)
Rajah and Tann	1 cases	17% of cases	CHS CPO GmbH v Vikas Goel: Fortification of Undertakings for Mareva Injunction & Anton Piller Order(Apr 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Julian Soong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 2 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Partial	26.0 parties avg	6.0	33%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2005	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2006	24.7 parties avg	4.7
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Julian Soong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(33%)	33%
Partial	2(33%)	33%
Won	2(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,720,811.90	344,162.385 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2005	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Sin Lian Heng Construction v. Singapore Telecommunications: Breach of Contract & Cable Recovery Dispute 01 Aug 2010 Singapore Telecommunications Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Won	01 Aug 2010	Singapore Telecommunications Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of Singtel in the sum of $1,719,211.90, with interest from the date of writ to date of judgment at 5.33% per annum. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Deutsche Bank v Chang Tse Wen: Electronic Discovery Protocol Dispute in Loan Recovery 25 Apr 2010 Chang Tse Wen (Defendant, Plaintiff)Won	25 Apr 2010	Chang Tse Wen (Defendant, Plaintiff): Application granted with modificationsCosts fixed at $1,600 plus reasonable disbursements to be paid by the Plaintiff forthwith. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Sin Lian Heng Construction v Singapore Telecommunications: Admissibility of 'Without Prejudice' Communications 14 Feb 2007 Singapore Telecommunications Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	14 Feb 2007	Singapore Telecommunications Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal dismissed in part in relation to paragraphs 19, 19(a) – (d) and Prayer 3 of the Defence and Counterclaim. Costs be in the cause. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Teo Chin Kiang Willie v MAE Engineering Ltd: Unlawful Termination, Breach of Contract, Director's Duties, and Negligence Claims 28 Jun 2006 MAE Engineering Ltd (Defendant)Lost	28 Jun 2006	MAE Engineering Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedThe defendant's counterclaim was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	CHS CPO GmbH v Vikas Goel: Discharge of Anton Piller & Mareva Injunctions for Fraud & Asset Dissipation 21 Mar 2006 Karma International SARL (Plaintiff)Partial	21 Mar 2006	Karma International SARL (Plaintiff): Mareva injunction dischargedMareva injunction discharged in respect of Esys, Goel and Karma Singapore.
6	CHS CPO GmbH v Vikas Goel: Fortification of Undertakings for Mareva Injunction & Anton Piller Order 25 Apr 2005 Karma International SARL (Plaintiff)Partial	25 Apr 2005	Karma International SARL (Plaintiff): Application allowed in partApplication for fortification of undertakings as to damages allowed in part for the third defendant only.