Julian Tay

Julian Tay is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 16 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and fiduciary duties. Their track record shows a 53.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 13% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Julian Tay has demonstrated expertise across 82 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	9 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	5 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	5 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized91% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bills of Exchange Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Land Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interim injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Money and moneylenders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conversion	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abetment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy to Defraud	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Falsification of Documents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Tenancy Agreements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Distributorship Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Consent of Public Prosecutor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Court Order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Derivative action	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Deeds	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Securities Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Void marriage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Electronic Discovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Leases	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rent	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Club Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Extradition Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Goods Sold and Delivered	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stockbroking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Voidable Marriage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Friendly Loans	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegal gratification	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Public Entertainment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asylum	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conveyance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conveyancing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Julian Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Julian Tay has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 13 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Lee & Lee	13 cases	81% of cases	Millsopp v Then: Breach of Contract & Misrepresentation in FX Agreement Dispute(Oct 2021) HSBC Trustee v Lucky Realty: Lease Interpretation & Rent Calculation(Apr 2015) PP v Li Weiming: Criminal Case Disclosure, Intent to Defraud, Falsification of Accounts(Jan 2014)
Lee and Lee	2 cases	13% of cases	Henny Sutanto v Chandra Suwandi: Cheque Presentation & Bills of Exchange Act(Sep 2005) Henny Sutanto v Suriani Tani: Unlicensed Moneylending & Cheque Liability Dispute(Apr 2005)
Unknown	1 cases	6% of cases	Breezeway Overseas v UBS AG: Electronic Discovery Protocol & Search Terms Dispute(Feb 2012)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Julian Tay's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.6
Complex Cases: 2 (13%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	14.0 parties avg	4.0	6%
Lost	52.0 parties avg	2.0	31%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	6%
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	6%
Won	92.6 parties avg	2.6	56%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2011	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2012	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2014	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Julian Tay's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(6%)	6%
Lost	5(29%)	29%
Neutral	1(6%)	6%
Partial	1(6%)	6%
Won	9(53%)	53%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	8,452,012.47	1,056,501.568 cases	8

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2002	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2005	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	3 111	Dismissed: 1 cases (33.3%) Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2014	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 16 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Millsopp v Then: Breach of Contract & Misrepresentation in FX Agreement Dispute 27 Oct 2021 Millsopp, Michael Joseph (Plaintiff)Lost	27 Oct 2021	Millsopp, Michael Joseph (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claims for misrepresentation, breach of contract, conversion, and unjust enrichment were dismissed.
2	HSBC Trustee v Lucky Realty: Lease Interpretation & Rent Calculation 12 Apr 2015 LUCKY REALTY CO PTE LTD (Defendant)Lost	12 Apr 2015	LUCKY REALTY CO PTE LTD (Defendant): Claim DismissedDefendant's argument that the rent should be calculated based only on Block D was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	PP v Li Weiming: Criminal Case Disclosure, Intent to Defraud, Falsification of Accounts 22 Jan 2014 Thomas Philip Doehrman (Respondent)Partial	22 Jan 2014	Thomas Philip Doehrman (Respondent): Orders for particulars set asideThe court set aside the Judge’s orders that the PP provide the respondents with (a) the identity of the persons whom the respondents allegedly conspired to defraud and (b) the reasons why the subcontract between ZTE and Questzone was allegedly fictitious.
4	Christanto Radius v Public Prosecutor: Extradition, Bail, and Criminal Procedure Code 23 May 2012 Christanto Radius (Applicant)Won	23 May 2012	Christanto Radius (Applicant): Bail GrantedBail granted at $2,000,000 in two sureties with specific conditions.
5	Breezeway Overseas v UBS AG: Electronic Discovery Protocol & Search Terms Dispute 27 Feb 2012 Vasanmal Murli (Plaintiff)Neutral	27 Feb 2012	Vasanmal Murli (Plaintiff): Order for electronic discovery protocolOrder for electronic discovery protocol in stages with the use of search terms.
6	Fong Wai Lyn Carolyn v Airtrust: Derivative Action for Breach of Fiduciary Duty 10 Apr 2011 Airtrust (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	10 Apr 2011	Airtrust (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Applications to set aside freezing and search orders allowedApplications to set aside freezing and search orders allowed.
7	ABB v Sher Hock Guan: Director's Fiduciary Duties & Contractual Terms in Competitor Assistance 05 Jul 2009 ABB Industry Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	05 Jul 2009	ABB Industry Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the third plaintiff against the defendant for either damages to be assessed or an account of the defendant’s profits to be taken, at the election of the third plaintiff. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Tan Ah Thee v Lim Soo Foong: Declaration of Marriage Validity & Undue Influence 26 Apr 2009 Tan Ah Thee And Another (administrators of the estate of Tan Kiam Poh (alias Tan Gna Chua), deceased) (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	26 Apr 2009	Tan Ah Thee And Another (administrators of the estate of Tan Kiam Poh (alias Tan Gna Chua), deceased) (Plaintiff, Appellant): Claim DismissedPlaintiffs' statement of claim is struck out and the plaintiffs' claim is dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Hawley & Hazel v Szu Ming: Summary Judgment for Goods Sold, Parallel Imports & Distributorship Termination 27 Jan 2008 Szu Ming Trading Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	27 Jan 2008	Szu Ming Trading Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed and final judgment awarded to the plaintiff in the sum of $6,452,012.47 with interest at 5.33% per annum from the date of the writ (9 March 2007) to the date of judgment (21 September 2007). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Koh Zhan Quan Tony v Public Prosecutor: Jurisdiction of Court of Appeal in Criminal Appeals 24 Apr 2006 Koh Zhan Quan Tony (Applicant)Lost	24 Apr 2006	Koh Zhan Quan Tony (Applicant): Applications dismissedThe court dismissed the applications challenging its jurisdiction.
11	Henny Sutanto v Chandra Suwandi: Cheque Presentation & Bills of Exchange Act 20 Sep 2005 Chandra Suwandi (trading as Global Standard Marketing) (Respondent)Won	20 Sep 2005	Chandra Suwandi (trading as Global Standard Marketing) (Respondent): Claim DismissedMdm Henny’s claim against Chandra was dismissed.
12	Henny Sutanto v Suriani Tani: Unlicensed Moneylending & Cheque Liability Dispute 25 Apr 2005 Chandra Suwandi t/a Global Standard Marketing (Defendant)Won	25 Apr 2005	Chandra Suwandi t/a Global Standard Marketing (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the second defendant; plaintiff's claim dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	Public Prosecutor v Hendricks Glen Conleth: Abetment of Corruption in Smuggling Operation 13 Dec 2002 Hendricks Glen Conleth (Respondent)Won	13 Dec 2002	Hendricks Glen Conleth (Respondent): AcquittedThe respondent was acquitted of the charge of abetting by intentional aid.
14	Ang Kah Kee v PP: Appeal Against Conviction for Voluntarily Causing Hurt 26 Mar 2002 Ang Kah Kee (Appellant)Won	26 Mar 2002	Ang Kah Kee (Appellant): Appeal against conviction and sentence allowedAppeal against conviction and sentence allowed.
15	Chin Hong Oon Ronny v Tanah Merah Country Club: Disciplinary Proceedings & Natural Justice 20 May 2001 Tanah Merah Country Club (Defendant)Won	20 May 2001	Tanah Merah Country Club (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant; Plaintiff's application dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
16	AMS Securities v Thio Gwan Choon: Stockbroking Losses & CEO Liability 22 Feb 2001 Thio Gwan Choon (Defendant)Won	22 Feb 2001	Thio Gwan Choon (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant; the plaintiff's claim was dismissed.