Public Prosecutor v Hendricks Glen Conleth: Abetment of Corruption in Smuggling Operation

In Public Prosecutor v Hendricks Glen Conleth, the High Court of Singapore heard an appeal against the acquittal of Hendricks Glen Conleth on a charge of abetting by intentional aid, under s 6(a) read with s 29(a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, Cap 241. Conleth was accused of assisting Madhavan s/o Rajagopal in using false airline boarding passes to smuggle individuals into the USA. The Chief Justice dismissed the appeal, finding that the prosecution had not proven beyond a reasonable doubt that Conleth possessed the requisite mens rea, specifically knowledge of Madu's corrupt actions in creating the false boarding passes.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Appeal Dismissed

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Hendricks Glen Conleth was acquitted of abetting corruption by intentionally aiding Madu in smuggling people into the USA using false boarding passes. The appeal against his acquittal was dismissed.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorAppellantGovernment AgencyAppeal DismissedLost
Hui Choon Kuen of Deputy Public Prosecutor
Hendricks Glen ConlethRespondentIndividualAcquittedWon

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Yong Pung HowChief JusticeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Hui Choon KuenDeputy Public Prosecutor
Julian TayLee & Lee

4. Facts

  1. Conleth was charged with abetting Madu in committing an offence under s 6(a) of the PCA.
  2. Madu was a Customer Services Officer with Singapore Airport Terminal Services Ltd.
  3. Conleth was a former Customer Services Officer and colleague of Madu.
  4. Madu approached Conleth for help in smuggling people overseas, promising him $4,500.
  5. Conleth agreed to help Madu because he needed money to settle his credit card bills.
  6. Conleth and Madu flew to Bangkok, where Madu provided details about the smuggling operation.
  7. The plan involved using fake boarding passes to board a flight to the USA.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Public Prosecutor v Hendricks Glen Conleth, MA 152/2002, [2002] SGHC 306

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Conleth resigned from Singapore Airport Terminal Services Ltd.
Madu approached Conleth for help in smuggling people overseas.
Conleth and Madu flew to Bangkok.
Conleth and Madu returned to Singapore from Bangkok.
Conleth and Madu returned to Singapore from Hong Kong.
Decision Date

7. Legal Issues

  1. Mens Rea
    • Outcome: The court found that the prosecution had not proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the respondent possessed the requisite mens rea for the offence of abetment by intentional aid.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Knowledge of offence
      • Intentional aid

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Conviction and punishment for abetment of corruption

9. Cause of Actions

  • Abetment by intentional aid

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Appeals

11. Industries

  • Aviation

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Ang Jwee Herng v PPN/AYes[2001] 2 SLR 474SingaporeCited regarding the appellate court's reluctance to overturn findings of fact by the trial judge, especially when credibility of witnesses is assessed.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Prevention of Corruption Act (Cap 241, 1993 Rev Ed) s 6(a)Singapore
Prevention of Corruption Act (Cap 241, 1993 Rev Ed) s 29(a)Singapore
Penal Code, Cap 224 s 107(c)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Abetment
  • Mens Rea
  • Corruption
  • Smuggling
  • Boarding Passes
  • Intentional Aid

15.2 Keywords

  • Corruption
  • Abetment
  • Mens Rea
  • Smuggling
  • Singapore
  • Criminal Law

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Corruption
  • Abetment