Julian Tay Wei Loong

Julian Tay Wei Loong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and murder. Their track record shows a 22.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 11% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated expertise across 44 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal procedure and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Procedure	5 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	4 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Finding of fact	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Witnesses' credibility and veracity	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Theft	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Murder	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Strata Titles	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Robbery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bills of Exchange	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Domestic Maid Abuse	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Immigration Offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rent Review Clause	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Variation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
En Bloc Sale	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
HUDC Estate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Outraging Modesty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment of Foreign Workers Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Illegal Entry	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Domestic Maids	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Collective Sales	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Work Permits	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Julian Tay Wei Loong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Julian Tay Wei Loong has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Lee & Lee	5 cases	56% of cases	Lucky Realty v HSBC Trustee: Contractual Interpretation & Rent Review Clause(Dec 2015) Toh Yong Soon v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Driving Disqualification Under Motor Vehicles Act(Mar 2011) Chang Mei Wah Selena v Wiener Robert Lorenz: En Bloc Sale Approval Dispute in Privatized Ex-HUDC Estate(Jun 2008)
Lee and Lee	4 cases	44% of cases	Gan Too Cheh v PP: Employing Foreign Worker Outside Work Permit Conditions(Feb 2006) PP v Lim Poh Lye: Murder Conviction Upheld for Robbery Resulting in Death(Jul 2005) Public Prosecutor v Lim Poh Lye: Culpable Homicide, Common Intention, and Murder Charge(Jan 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Julian Tay Wei Loong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.8
Complex Cases: 1 (11%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	72.6 parties avg	2.6	78%
Won	28.8 parties avg	8.8	22%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2004	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2005	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	111.0 parties avg	11.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Julian Tay Wei Loong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	7(78%)	78%
Won	2(22%)	22%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lucky Realty v HSBC Trustee: Contractual Interpretation & Rent Review Clause 03 Dec 2015 LUCKY REALTY COMPANY PTE LTD (Appellant)Won	03 Dec 2015	LUCKY REALTY COMPANY PTE LTD (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs.
2	Toh Yong Soon v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Driving Disqualification Under Motor Vehicles Act 14 Mar 2011 Toh Yong Soon (Appellant)Lost	14 Mar 2011	Toh Yong Soon (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against disqualification from driving was dismissed.
3	Chang Mei Wah Selena v Wiener Robert Lorenz: En Bloc Sale Approval Dispute in Privatized Ex-HUDC Estate 24 Jun 2008 Ragunath Guha Ramanathan (Respondent)Won	24 Jun 2008	Ragunath Guha Ramanathan (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentApplications dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Gan Too Cheh v PP: Employing Foreign Worker Outside Work Permit Conditions 09 Feb 2006 Gan Too Cheh (Appellant)Lost	09 Feb 2006	Gan Too Cheh (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed.
5	PP v Lim Poh Lye: Murder Conviction Upheld for Robbery Resulting in Death 14 Jul 2005 Koh Zhan Quan Tony (Respondent)Lost	14 Jul 2005	Koh Zhan Quan Tony (Respondent): Convicted of MurderConvicted of murder under s 302, read with s 34, of the Penal Code, which carries the mandatory death penalty.
6	Public Prosecutor v Lim Poh Lye: Culpable Homicide, Common Intention, and Murder Charge 23 Jan 2005 Koh Zhan Quan Tony (Defendant)Lost	23 Jan 2005	Koh Zhan Quan Tony (Defendant): Guilty of robbery with hurtFound guilty of an offence under Section 394 of the Penal Code (robbery with hurt).
7	Sutanto Henny v Suriani Tani: Striking Out Claim for Cheque Payment 13 Jan 2004 Chandra Suwandi t/a M/s Global Standard Marketing (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	13 Jan 2004	Chandra Suwandi t/a M/s Global Standard Marketing (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe second defendant's application to strike out the plaintiff's claim was initially allowed by the Assistant Registrar, but this decision was overturned on appeal.
8	Lim Kim Luan v Public Prosecutor: Employer Abuse of Domestic Helper - Voluntarily Causing Hurt 14 Jul 2002 Lim Kim Luan (Appellant)Lost	14 Jul 2002	Lim Kim Luan (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
9	Chan Mei Yoong Letticia v Public Prosecutor: Illegal Immigrant Employment & Due Diligence 29 Apr 2002 Chan Mei Yoong Letticia (Appellant)Lost	29 Apr 2002	Chan Mei Yoong Letticia (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed.