K Anparasan

K Anparasan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 16 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 6 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in negligence and jurisdiction. Their track record shows a 29.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 19% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

K Anparasan has demonstrated expertise across 67 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and personal injury.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	8 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	6 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	6 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	5 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Negligence	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insurance	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Workers Compensation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Vicarious liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Discovery of documents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Statutory Duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contribution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liability insurance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Occupiers' Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Workplace accident	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Law of Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Reinstatement to Roll of Advocates and Solicitors	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Nullity Suit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Lifeguard Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Swimming Pool Safety	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Industrial Accident	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Double Insurance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Non-contribution clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Hospitality Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance Bad Faith	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Premises Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	K Anparasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

K Anparasan has been affiliated with 6 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
KhattarWong LLP	5 cases	31% of cases	Sharma v Ahuja: Forum Non Conveniens in Nullity Suit under Hindu Marriage Act(Apr 2015) Narindar Singh Kang v Law Society: Reinstatement to Roll After Corruption Conviction(Sep 2013) Boey Chun Hian v Singapore Sports Council: Specific Discovery Application in Negligence Claim for Near-Drowning Incident(May 2013)
KhattarWong	3 cases	19% of cases	Kalpanath Singh v Law Society: Reinstatement to Roll of Advocates and Solicitors(Aug 2009) Keppel Singmarine v Ng Chan Teng: Contributory Negligence and District Court Jurisdictional Limit(Mar 2008) Cosmic Insurance v United Oil: Indemnity for Workman's Hospital Expenses under Workmen's Compensation Act(May 2006)
William Chai & Rama	3 cases	19% of cases	Wong Jin Fah v L &M Prestressing: Insurance Coverage Dispute(Sep 2001) Wong Jin Fah v L & M Prestressing: Construction Site Accident, Breach of Statutory Duty, Negligence, Occupier's Liability(Aug 2001) Liberty Citystate Insurance v AXA Insurance: Validity of Non-Contribution Clause in Liability Insurance(Mar 2001)
Khattar Wong and Partners	2 cases	13% of cases	QBE Insurance v Winterthur Insurance: Breach of Contract & Promissory Estoppel in Double Insurance Claim(Jan 2005) Lim Kah Ho Maurice v Beenleigh Construction: Stay of Proceedings Under Arbitration Act(Nov 2003)
Khattar Wong & Partners	2 cases	13% of cases	Abdul Latif v Saeed Husain: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Employee Competition(Jan 2003) Sim Lee Keng Cindy v Paul Bayliss Brown: Negligence, Motor Vehicle Accident, Third Party Liability(Nov 2002)
Khattar Wong	1 cases	6% of cases	Ng Chan Teng v Keppel Singmarine: Transfer of Damages Assessment to High Court(Jan 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of K Anparasan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.2
Complex Cases: 3 (19%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	93.1 parties avg	3.1	56%
Neutral	23.3 parties avg	3.3	13%
Other	17.0 parties avg	7.0	6%
Won	52.4 parties avg	2.4	31%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	35.0 parties avg	5.0
2002	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2003	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	32.7 parties avg	2.7
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of K Anparasan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	9(53%)	53%
Neutral	2(12%)	12%
Other	1(6%)	6%
Won	5(29%)	29%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	19,875.00	2,208.339 cases	9

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	4 1111	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%) Other: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 16 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Sharma v Ahuja: Forum Non Conveniens in Nullity Suit under Hindu Marriage Act 21 Apr 2015 Sanjeev Sharma s/o Shri Sarvjeet Sharma (Appellant)Lost	21 Apr 2015	Sanjeev Sharma s/o Shri Sarvjeet Sharma (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of the appeal and the husband’s application to adduce further evidence fixed at $5,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Narindar Singh Kang v Law Society: Reinstatement to Roll After Corruption Conviction 29 Sep 2013 Law Society of Singapore (Respondent)Neutral	29 Sep 2013	Law Society of Singapore (Respondent): NeutralThe Law Society did not object to the application, subject to certain conditions being imposed.
3	Boey Chun Hian v Singapore Sports Council: Specific Discovery Application in Negligence Claim for Near-Drowning Incident 21 May 2013 Singapore Sports Council (Defendant)Lost	21 May 2013	Singapore Sports Council (Defendant): Application DismissedDefendant was ordered to produce the witnesses’ statements and the Committee of Inquiry Report. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Ong Han Ling v Low Ai Ming Sally: Garnishee Order Dispute Over Fraudulent Misrepresentation Claim 28 Jan 2013 ONG HAN LING (Plaintiff)Lost	28 Jan 2013	ONG HAN LING (Plaintiff): Application dismissedOng's application for a garnishee order to show cause was dismissed.
5	Hendricks v Shangri-La: Hotel Liability for Lost Ring & Innkeepers Act 24 Oct 2011 Shangri-la Hotel Ltd (Defendant)Won	24 Oct 2011	Shangri-la Hotel Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant; plaintiff's claim dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Kalpanath Singh v Law Society: Reinstatement to Roll of Advocates and Solicitors 25 Aug 2009 Law Society of Singapore (Respondent)Won	25 Aug 2009	Law Society of Singapore (Respondent): Application dismissedThe Law Society's position against the application was upheld as the application was dismissed.
7	Ng Chan Teng v Keppel Singmarine: Transfer of Damages Assessment to High Court 12 Jan 2009 Keppel Singmarine Dockyard Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	12 Jan 2009	Keppel Singmarine Dockyard Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application dismissedThe defendant's arguments against the transfer of the action were dismissed.
8	Keppel Singmarine v Ng Chan Teng: Contributory Negligence and District Court Jurisdictional Limit 12 Mar 2008 Keppel Singmarine Dockyard Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	12 Mar 2008	Keppel Singmarine Dockyard Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was dismissed, and Keppel Singmarine Dockyard Pte Ltd was ordered to pay costs. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
9	Cosmic Insurance v United Oil: Indemnity for Workman's Hospital Expenses under Workmen's Compensation Act 24 May 2006 Cosmic Insurance Corp Ltd (Appellant)Lost	24 May 2006	Cosmic Insurance Corp Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the court held that hospital expenses do not constitute 'compensation' under the WCA. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	QBE Insurance v Winterthur Insurance: Breach of Contract & Promissory Estoppel in Double Insurance Claim 23 Jan 2005 Winterthur Insurance (Far East) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	23 Jan 2005	Winterthur Insurance (Far East) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application DismissedQBE's application was dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.
11	Lim Kah Ho Maurice v Beenleigh Construction: Stay of Proceedings Under Arbitration Act 19 Nov 2003 Beenleigh Construction And Project Management Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	19 Nov 2003	Beenleigh Construction And Project Management Pte Ltd (Defendant): Preliminary Objection UpheldPreliminary objection to the application upheld; application dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
12	Abdul Latif v Saeed Husain: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Employee Competition 30 Jan 2003 Saeed Husain s/o Hakim Gulam Mohiudin (trading as United Limousine) (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	30 Jan 2003	Saeed Husain s/o Hakim Gulam Mohiudin (trading as United Limousine) (Defendant, Respondent): Damages awarded to PlaintiffDamages of $14,875 awarded to the plaintiff for the combi component (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
13	Sim Lee Keng Cindy v Paul Bayliss Brown: Negligence, Motor Vehicle Accident, Third Party Liability 17 Nov 2002 Chua Chuan Leong & Sons Pte Ltd (Third Party)Lost	17 Nov 2002	Chua Chuan Leong & Sons Pte Ltd (Third Party): Liable for ContributionThird Party found liable for 50% contribution to the plaintiff's claim (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
14	Wong Jin Fah v L &M Prestressing: Insurance Coverage Dispute 28 Sep 2001 Liberty Citystate Insurance Pte Ltd (Other)Neutral	28 Sep 2001	Liberty Citystate Insurance Pte Ltd (Other): No outcome information provided in the text.No outcome information provided in the text.
15	Wong Jin Fah v L & M Prestressing: Construction Site Accident, Breach of Statutory Duty, Negligence, Occupier's Liability 30 Aug 2001 Liberty Citystate Insurance Pte Ltd formerly known as Citystate Insurance Pte Ltd (Third Party)Other	30 Aug 2001	Liberty Citystate Insurance Pte Ltd formerly known as Citystate Insurance Pte Ltd (Third Party): Indemnification OrderShall indemnify the first and third defendants for their liability to the plaintiff.
16	Liberty Citystate Insurance v AXA Insurance: Validity of Non-Contribution Clause in Liability Insurance 07 Mar 2001 Liberty Citystate Insurance Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent)Won	07 Mar 2001	Liberty Citystate Insurance Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed; Citystate not liable to pay compensation due to valid non-contribution clause.