Wong Jin Fah v L &M Prestressing: Insurance Coverage Dispute
In the case of Wong Jin Fah versus L & M Prestressing Pte Ltd and Others, the High Court of Singapore heard arguments on 2001-09-29. The case involved Liberty Citystate Insurance Pte Ltd as a third party. The judgment concerned an insurance coverage dispute. The court's ultimate decision is not specified in the provided text.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court1.2 Outcome
No outcome information provided in the text.
1.3 Case Type
Civil
1.4 Judgment Type
Judgment
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Insurance coverage dispute between Wong Jin Fah and L&M Prestressing. The High Court heard arguments regarding Liberty Citystate Insurance's liability.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberty Citystate Insurance Pte Ltd | Other | Corporation | No outcome information provided in the text. | Neutral | |
Wong Jin Fah | Plaintiff | Individual | No outcome information provided in the text. | Neutral | |
L &M Prestressing Pte Ltd | Defendant | Corporation | No outcome information provided in the text. | Neutral | |
Tan Ken Siong | Defendant | Individual | No outcome information provided in the text. | Neutral | Tan Ken Siong of Independent Practitioner |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Lai Siu Chiu | Judge | Yes |
4. Counsels
Counsel Name | Organization |
---|---|
K Anparasan | William Chai & Rama |
Fazal Mohamed | B. Rao K.S. Rajah |
Vinodh Coomaraswamy | Shook Lin & Bok |
Dylan Lee | Shook Lin & Bok |
Tan Ken Siong | Independent Practitioner |
4. Facts
5. Formal Citations
- Wong Jin Fah v L &M Prestressing Pte Ltd, Suit 474/2000, [2001] SGHC 289
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Suit filed | |
Decision Date |
7. Legal Issues
8. Remedies Sought
- No remedies sought
9. Cause of Actions
- No cause of actions
10. Practice Areas
- Insurance Coverage
11. Industries
- No industries specified
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
No cited cases |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
No applicable statutes |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Insurance
- Coverage
15.2 Keywords
- Insurance
- Coverage
- Dispute
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Civil Litigation | 60 |
Civil Practice | 60 |
Insurance Litigation | 40 |
16. Subjects
- Insurance Coverage Dispute