K Mathialahan

K Mathialahan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 12 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and criminal procedure. Their track record shows a 42.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

K Mathialahan has demonstrated expertise across 47 primary practice areas, with significant experience in succession law and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Succession Law	4 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Family Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contracts	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Offences	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Proprietary Estoppel	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Intestate succession	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Divorce	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Abetment	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets Division	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Dishonest Misappropriation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Home Protection Insurance Scheme	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Child)	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
CPF Nomination	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Housing Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Immigration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Care and Control	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Access to Children	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Home	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	K Mathialahan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

K Mathialahan has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Guna & Associates	9 cases	75% of cases	Letchimy v Maha Devi: Proprietary Estoppel & Intestate Succession Dispute over HDB Flat(Jan 2021) Letchimy v Maha Devi: Proprietary Estoppel & Intestate Succession Dispute over HDB Flat(Jun 2020) Temasek Polytechnic v Poh Peng Ghee: Work Injury Compensation Appeal(Sep 2018)
Guna and Associates	2 cases	17% of cases	S Balakrishnan v PP: Abetment, Negligence & Sentencing in SAF Training Death(Aug 2005) PP v Kang Seong Yong: False Statement for Employment Pass - Immigration Act Sentencing Appeal(Feb 2005)
Guna & Associates Advocates & Solicitors	1 cases	8% of cases	Mohamed Nizam v Sadique Marican: Summary Judgment, Extension of Time, and Waiver of Irregularity(Oct 2008)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of K Mathialahan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 3 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	63.9 parties avg	3.9	50%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	8%
Won	52.6 parties avg	2.6	42%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2008	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2009	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2018	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of K Mathialahan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	6(50%)	50%
Partial	1(8%)	8%
Won	5(42%)	42%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	405,100.00	81,020.005 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 12 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Letchimy v Maha Devi: Proprietary Estoppel & Intestate Succession Dispute over HDB Flat 26 Jan 2021 Maha Devi d/o Palanisamy Nadasan (the administrator of the estate of Devi d/o N Gurusamy, deceased) (Respondent, Defendant)Won	26 Jan 2021	Maha Devi d/o Palanisamy Nadasan (the administrator of the estate of Devi d/o N Gurusamy, deceased) (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs fixed at $23,000, inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Letchimy v Maha Devi: Proprietary Estoppel & Intestate Succession Dispute over HDB Flat 28 Jun 2020 Maha Devi d/o Palanisamy Nadasan (administrator of the estate of Devi d/o Gurusamy, deceased) (Defendant)Won	28 Jun 2020	Maha Devi d/o Palanisamy Nadasan (administrator of the estate of Devi d/o Gurusamy, deceased) (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant; the plaintiff's claim was dismissed, and the court ordered costs against the plaintiff (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Temasek Polytechnic v Poh Peng Ghee: Work Injury Compensation Appeal 27 Sep 2018 Jonathan Poh Jun Hui (Respondent)Lost	27 Sep 2018	Jonathan Poh Jun Hui (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the Assistant Commissioner of Labour's decision was allowed, setting aside the order in their favor.
4	Mak Saw Ching v Yam Hui Min: Resulting Trust Dispute Over HDB Flat Ownership 23 Oct 2014 Yam Hui Min, Barbara Rebecca (Respondent)Won	23 Oct 2014	Yam Hui Min, Barbara Rebecca (Respondent): Claim DismissedThe Applicant's claim against the Respondent was dismissed.
5	Geyabalan v Public Prosecutor: Theft Conviction Appeal - Baggage Handlers at Changi Airport 03 Sep 2014 Geyabalan s/o K Ramiah (Appellant)Won	03 Sep 2014	Geyabalan s/o K Ramiah (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppellant's appeal against conviction was allowed.
6	Saseedaran Nair v Nalini: Division of Matrimonial Assets & Home Protection Insurance Scheme (HPIS) Payout 15 Jan 2012 Saseedaran Nair s/o Krishnan (now known as K Saseedaran Nair) (Appellant)Lost	15 Jan 2012	Saseedaran Nair s/o Krishnan (now known as K Saseedaran Nair) (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe husband's appeal was dismissed. The court held that the HPIS payout should be factored into the division of matrimonial assets. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Nalini v Saseedaran: Division of Matrimonial Assets & HPIS Payout Dispute 28 Mar 2010 Saseedaran Nair s/o Krishnan (Respondent, Defendant)Partial	28 Mar 2010	Saseedaran Nair s/o Krishnan (Respondent, Defendant): District Judge's order variedDistrict Judge's order varied to the extent that the HPIS payout is not to be deducted in calculating the net value of the Property for distribution between the parties.
8	Mohamed Nizam v Sadique Marican: Recovery of Entrusted Funds in Property Purchase 09 Jul 2009 Mohamed Nizam s/o Mohamed Ismail (Plaintiff)Won	09 Jul 2009	Mohamed Nizam s/o Mohamed Ismail (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffSummary judgment against the first and second defendants for $380,600 with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Mohamed Nizam v Sadique Marican: Summary Judgment, Extension of Time, and Waiver of Irregularity 28 Oct 2008 Mohamed Nizam s/o Mohamed Ismail (Plaintiff, Respondent)Lost	28 Oct 2008	Mohamed Nizam s/o Mohamed Ismail (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs fixed at $1,500 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	S Balakrishnan v PP: Abetment, Negligence & Sentencing in SAF Training Death 16 Aug 2005 Pandiaraj s/o Mayandi (Appellant)Lost	16 Aug 2005	Pandiaraj s/o Mayandi (Appellant): Appeal against conviction and sentence dismissed; sentences enhancedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed; sentences enhanced to 12 months for each offence, to run concurrently.
11	PP v Kang Seong Yong: False Statement for Employment Pass - Immigration Act Sentencing Appeal 01 Feb 2005 Kang Seong Yong (Respondent)Lost	01 Feb 2005	Kang Seong Yong (Respondent): Sentence EnhancedThe respondent's sentence was enhanced to one month's imprisonment on each charge, to run consecutively.
12	Amir Hamzah v PP: Abetment of CBT & Retaining Stolen Property 13 Dec 2002 Amir Hamzah Bin Berang Kuty (Appellant)Lost	13 Dec 2002	Amir Hamzah Bin Berang Kuty (Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe appellant's appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed.