Kam Kai Qi

Kam Kai Qi is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in estate administration and minority oppression. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 40% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kam Kai Qi has demonstrated expertise across 24 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Kam Kai Qi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Kam Kai Qi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Kam Kai Qi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kam Kai Qi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kam Kai Qi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kam Kai Qi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kam Kai Qi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kam Kai Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kam Kai Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kam Kai Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kam Kai Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Stay of Execution	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kam Kai Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kam Kai Qi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kam Kai Qi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kam Kai Qi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kam Kai Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kam Kai Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kam Kai Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kam Kai Qi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trademark Infringement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kam Kai Qi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Groundless threats of infringement proceedings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kam Kai Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kam Kai Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kam Kai Qi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kam Kai Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kam Kai Qi has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Wong Tan & Molly Lim LLC	3 cases	60% of cases	Telemedia Pacific Group v Yuanta: Stay of Execution Pending Appeal(Mar 2017) Singsung Pte Ltd v LG 26 Electronics: Passing Off, Copyright Infringement, Groundless Threats(May 2016) Li Suk Fong Susana v Shanghai Commercial Bank Trustee: Trust Administration & Trustee's Costs(Jun 2015)
CLASIS LLC	1 cases	20% of cases	Wang Weidong v SPM Global Services: Inducing Breach of Contract & Amendment of Pleadings(May 2018)
Wong Tan & Molly Lim	1 cases	20% of cases	Fan Heli v Zhang Shujing: Minority Oppression under Companies Act & Forum Non Conveniens(Dec 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kam Kai Qi's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.6
Complex Cases: 2 (40%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	24.5 parties avg	4.5	40%
Partial	22.5 parties avg	2.5	40%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kam Kai Qi's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(40%)	40%
Partial	2(40%)	40%
Won	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	40,000.00	13,333.333 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2016	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Wang Weidong v SPM Global Services: Inducing Breach of Contract & Amendment of Pleadings 01 May 2018 Mark Aldie Stiffler (Defendant, Respondent)Partial	01 May 2018	Mark Aldie Stiffler (Defendant, Respondent): Application partially successfulThe application to amend the Statement of Claim to include a cause of action against this party was disallowed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Telemedia Pacific Group v Yuanta: Stay of Execution Pending Appeal 12 Mar 2017 Yeh Mao-Yuan (Defendant)Lost	12 Mar 2017	Yeh Mao-Yuan (Defendant): Summons dismissedThe court dismissed the Defendant's summons and ordered the Defendant to pay costs fixed at $10,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Singsung Pte Ltd v LG 26 Electronics: Passing Off, Copyright Infringement, Groundless Threats 22 May 2016 LG 26 Electronics Pte Ltd (trading as L S Electrical Trading) (Respondent)Partial	22 May 2016	LG 26 Electronics Pte Ltd (trading as L S Electrical Trading) (Respondent): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal dismissed in part (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Fan Heli v Zhang Shujing: Minority Oppression under Companies Act & Forum Non Conveniens 22 Dec 2015 Zou Ping (Defendant)Lost	22 Dec 2015	Zou Ping (Defendant): Application for stay of proceedings declinedApplication for stay of proceedings declined; costs of $10,000 and reasonable disbursements were awarded to the Plaintiff. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Li Suk Fong Susana v Shanghai Commercial Bank Trustee: Trust Administration & Trustee's Costs 09 Jun 2015 Another (Defendant)Won	09 Jun 2015	Another (Defendant): Costs allowed from trust fundThe court allowed the defendants to recover costs of the action from the trust fund. The quantum of costs is to be determined at a later date, if parties are unable to agree.