Li Suk Fong Susana v Shanghai Commercial Bank Trustee: Trust Administration & Trustee's Costs

In Li Suk Fong Susana v Shanghai Commercial Bank Trustee Ltd, the Singapore High Court addressed a dispute arising from Originating Summons No 1186 of 2013, concerning the administration of the estate of the late Lorenz Hennryk Gustav. The plaintiff, Li Suk Fong Susana, sought the transfer of the Singapore estate as the sole remaining beneficiary. The dispute centered on the defendants' application to retain S$700,000 for trustee's costs, including taxes and expenses related to other jurisdictions. The court allowed the defendants to recover costs of the action from the trust fund, with the quantum of costs to be determined at a later date if parties are unable to agree.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

The court allowed the defendants to recover costs of the action from the trust fund, with the quantum of costs to be determined at a later date if parties are unable to agree.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

The High Court addressed a dispute over trustee's costs in administering a will, concerning the retention of funds from the Singapore estate.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Li Suk Fong SusanaPlaintiffIndividualCosts to be determinedNeutralJason Lim Chen Thor, Goh Kok Yeow, Lim Xinhua
Shanghai Commercial Bank Trustee LtdDefendantCorporationCosts allowed from trust fundWonMolly Lim, Yap Jie Han, Kam Kai Qi
AnotherDefendantOtherCosts allowed from trust fundWonMolly Lim, Yap Jie Han, Kam Kai Qi

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Choo Han TeckJYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Jason Lim Chen ThorDe Souza Lim & Goh LLP
Goh Kok YeowDe Souza Lim & Goh LLP
Lim XinhuaDe Souza Lim & Goh LLP
Molly LimWong Tan & Molly Lim LLC
Yap Jie HanWong Tan & Molly Lim LLC
Kam Kai QiWong Tan & Molly Lim LLC

4. Facts

  1. The deceased was a German national domiciled in Hong Kong.
  2. The deceased appointed the first defendant as trustee and executor of his will.
  3. The will bequeathed the Non-German Residuary estate to the plaintiff.
  4. The defendants applied to retain S$700,000 for trustee's costs.
  5. The plaintiff objected to the retention of funds.
  6. The defendants claimed expenses related to taxes and administration of estates in other jurisdictions.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Li Suk Fong Susana v Shanghai Commercial Bank Trustee Ltd and another, Originating Summons No 1186 of 2013 (Summons No 1578 of 2014), [2015] SGHC 152

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Will dated
Originating Summons No 1186 of 2013 filed
Summons No 1578 of 2014
Judgment reserved

7. Legal Issues

  1. Trustee's Costs
    • Outcome: The court allowed the defendants to recover costs of the action from the trust fund.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Reasonableness of costs
      • Benefit to the fund

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Transfer of Singapore estate
  2. Objection to trustee's costs

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Trust

10. Practice Areas

  • Trust Administration

11. Industries

  • Banking

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
No cited cases

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Rules of Court (Cap 322, R 5, 2014 Rev Ed) O 59 r 6(2)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Trustee's costs
  • Non-German Residuary estate
  • Singapore estate
  • Trust fund

15.2 Keywords

  • Trustee
  • Costs
  • Estate
  • Will
  • Beneficiary

16. Subjects

  • Trusts
  • Estate Administration
  • Civil Litigation

17. Areas of Law

  • Trust Law
  • Civil Procedure