Kang Kim Yang

Kang Kim Yang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in personal injury and loss of amenities. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kang Kim Yang has demonstrated expertise across 27 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and property law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Kang Kim Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Kang Kim Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kang Kim Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Loss of Amenities	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Kang Kim Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kang Kim Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kang Kim Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Kang Kim Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kang Kim Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kang Kim Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kang Kim Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kang Kim Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kang Kim Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kang Kim Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kang Kim Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Power of Attorney	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kang Kim Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kang Kim Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kang Kim Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kang Kim Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Pain and Suffering	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kang Kim Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kang Kim Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Persistent Vegetative State	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kang Kim Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kang Kim Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kang Kim Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kang Kim Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kang Kim Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kang Kim Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kang Kim Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kang Kim Yang has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Templars Law LLC	2 cases	33% of cases	Goh Yng Yng Karen v Goh Yong Chiang Kelvin: Mental Capacity & Undue Influence in Power of Attorney(Sep 2020) Asnah v Jin Ting: Appeal on Unpaid Salary Claim under Employment Act(Nov 2016)
Joseph Tan Jude Benny LLP	2 cases	33% of cases	AQV v AQW: Wife's Application to Set Aside Ancillary Orders Based on Alleged Judicial Bias(May 2011) Fico Sports v Thong Hup Gardens: Tenancy Dispute over Land Use and Sub-letting Rights(Aug 2010)
Joseph Tan Jude Benny	1 cases	17% of cases	Tan Kok Lam v Hong Choon Peng: Loss of Amenities for Plaintiff in Persistent Vegetative State(Sep 2000)
Joseph Tan Jude Benny Anne Choo	1 cases	17% of cases	Tan Kok Lam v Hong Choon Peng: Damages for Loss of Amenities for Unconscious Plaintiff in Negligence Claim(Apr 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kang Kim Yang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%
Partial	22.7 parties avg	2.7	33%
Won	32.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kang Kim Yang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(17%)	17%
Partial	2(33%)	33%
Won	3(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	102,700.00	25,675.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Goh Yng Yng Karen v Goh Yong Chiang Kelvin: Mental Capacity & Undue Influence in Power of Attorney 16 Sep 2020 Goh Yng Yng Karen (executrix of the estate of Liew Khoon Fong (alias Liew Fong), deceased) (Plaintiff)Won	16 Sep 2020	Goh Yng Yng Karen (executrix of the estate of Liew Khoon Fong (alias Liew Fong), deceased) (Plaintiff): Declaration GrantedDeclaration that the Powers of Attorney are void.
2	Asnah v Jin Ting: Appeal on Unpaid Salary Claim under Employment Act 16 Nov 2016 Chua Guan Soon (Applicant)Partial	16 Nov 2016	Chua Guan Soon (Applicant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; applicants obliged to pay respondent $600 for work in November 2015, after setting off $300 unpaid loan. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	AQV v AQW: Wife's Application to Set Aside Ancillary Orders Based on Alleged Judicial Bias 31 May 2011 AQW (Defendant)Won	31 May 2011	AQW (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantOriginating Summons dismissed with costs.
4	Fico Sports v Thong Hup Gardens: Tenancy Dispute over Land Use and Sub-letting Rights 16 Aug 2010 Fico Sports Inc Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	16 Aug 2010	Fico Sports Inc Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedFico Sports' claim for breach of contract, misrepresentation, and specific performance was dismissed.
5	Tan Kok Lam v Hong Choon Peng: Damages for Loss of Amenities for Unconscious Plaintiff in Negligence Claim 18 Apr 2001 Tan Kok Lam (next friend to Teng Eng) (Appellant)Won	18 Apr 2001	Tan Kok Lam (next friend to Teng Eng) (Appellant): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed, restoring the assistant registrar's award of $80,000 for loss of amenities. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Tan Kok Lam v Hong Choon Peng: Loss of Amenities for Plaintiff in Persistent Vegetative State 28 Sep 2000 Tan Kok Lam, next friend of Teng Eng, a patient in this action (Plaintiff)Partial	28 Sep 2000	Tan Kok Lam, next friend of Teng Eng, a patient in this action (Plaintiff): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part, reducing the damages awarded for loss of amenities from $80,000 to $21,500 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).