Kara Quek Tze-Min

Kara Quek Tze-Min is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and civil practice. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kara Quek Tze-Min has demonstrated expertise across 39 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and costs.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kara Quek Tze-Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Costs	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kara Quek Tze-Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	4 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Kara Quek Tze-Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Kara Quek Tze-Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Kara Quek Tze-Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Kara Quek Tze-Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Appeal	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Kara Quek Tze-Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kara Quek Tze-Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kara Quek Tze-Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kara Quek Tze-Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kara Quek Tze-Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Setting aside arbitral awards	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kara Quek Tze-Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kara Quek Tze-Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kara Quek Tze-Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kara Quek Tze-Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kara Quek Tze-Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kara Quek Tze-Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kara Quek Tze-Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kara Quek Tze-Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kara Quek Tze-Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kara Quek Tze-Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Singapore International Commercial Court Rules	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kara Quek Tze-Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kara Quek Tze-Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kara Quek Tze-Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kara Quek Tze-Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kara Quek Tze-Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Thai Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kara Quek Tze-Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interest	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kara Quek Tze-Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
UNCITRAL Model Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kara Quek Tze-Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rules of court	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kara Quek Tze-Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Stare Decisis	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Kara Quek Tze-Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kara Quek Tze-Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kara Quek Tze-Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assessment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kara Quek Tze-Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Remoteness	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Kara Quek Tze-Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction of Arbitral tribunal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kara Quek Tze-Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Double Separability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Kara Quek Tze-Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kara Quek Tze-Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kara Quek Tze-Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kara Quek Tze-Min has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	5 cases	100% of cases	CBX v CBZ: Appeal on Costs in SICC Arbitration Setting Aside Proceedings(Jun 2021) CBX v CBZ: Setting Aside Arbitration Awards & Costs \| International Arbitration Act(Jun 2021) Ong Heng Chuan v Ong Teck Chuan: Minority Oppression under Companies Act(May 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kara Quek Tze-Min's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 5 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	35.0 parties avg	5.0	60%
Partial	15.0 parties avg	5.0	20%
Won	15.0 parties avg	5.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2021	35.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kara Quek Tze-Min's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(60%)	60%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	300,000.00	150,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2021	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	CBX v CBZ: Appeal on Costs in SICC Arbitration Setting Aside Proceedings 20 Jun 2021 CBY (Appellant, Plaintiff)Won	20 Jun 2021	CBY (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal AllowedAppeal against the Costs Judgment allowed; costs order made below set aside.
2	CBX v CBZ: Setting Aside Arbitration Awards & Costs \| International Arbitration Act 20 Jun 2021 CBY (Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	20 Jun 2021	CBY (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal allowed in partPhase II Partial Awards set aside in so far as they order payment of the Remaining Amounts. Costs Award set aside.
3	Ong Heng Chuan v Ong Teck Chuan: Minority Oppression under Companies Act 04 May 2021 Ong Heng Chuan (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	04 May 2021	Ong Heng Chuan (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; OHC to pay costs of the appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	CBX v CBZ: Costs Dispute After Dismissal of Application to Set Aside Arbitration Awards 07 Oct 2020 CBY (Plaintiff)Lost	07 Oct 2020	CBY (Plaintiff): Costs to be paid to DefendantsPlaintiffs are to pay the Defendants’ costs of S$150,000 (all-in). Simple interest at 5.33% per annum is to run on the amount of S$150,000 from the date of this judgment until payment by the Plaintiffs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	CBX v CBZ: Setting Aside Arbitration Awards for Exceeding Jurisdiction and Public Policy 15 Jul 2020 CBY (Plaintiff)Lost	15 Jul 2020	CBY (Plaintiff): Application DismissedThe Plaintiff's application to set aside parts of two Partial Awards and the whole of a Final Award was dismissed.