Karam Parmar

Karam Parmar is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2007 to 2007. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in en bloc sales and strata title law. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Karam Parmar has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in en bloc sales and property law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
En Bloc Sales	2 cases	17% of total caseload	Highly Specialized89% relevance score	Karam Parmar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	17% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Karam Parmar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	2 cases	17% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Karam Parmar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Karam Parmar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Karam Parmar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Karam Parmar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Joinder	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Karam Parmar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Karam Parmar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Striking Out Applications	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Karam Parmar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Karam Parmar has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	2 cases	100% of cases	Siow Doreen v Lo Pui Sang: Collective Sale Agreement Validity & Strata Titles Board Powers(Oct 2007) Siow Doreen v Lo Pui Sang: Application for En Bloc Sale Intervention(Sep 2007)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Karam Parmar's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 14.0
Complex Cases: 2 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	214.0 parties avg	14.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	214.0 parties avg	14.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Karam Parmar's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	2(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	2 2	Neutral: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Siow Doreen v Lo Pui Sang: Collective Sale Agreement Validity & Strata Titles Board Powers 10 Oct 2007 Others (Second Intervener)Neutral	10 Oct 2007	Others (Second Intervener): NeutralThe intervener's position was noted but no specific outcome was assigned.
2	Siow Doreen v Lo Pui Sang: Application for En Bloc Sale Intervention 30 Sep 2007 Maryani Sadeli (Respondent)Neutral	30 Sep 2007	Maryani Sadeli (Respondent): OtherApplication to intervene allowed.