Karam S Parmar

Karam S Parmar is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in construction law and arbitration. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Karam S Parmar has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and bankruptcy.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	20% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Karam S Parmar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 20% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Karam S Parmar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Karam S Parmar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Karam S Parmar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Karam S Parmar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Karam S Parmar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Karam S Parmar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Karam S Parmar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Fire Safety Engineering	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Karam S Parmar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Karam S Parmar has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	2 cases	100% of cases	Econ Piling v Sambo E&C: Scheme of Arrangement & Release of Joint Debtor Liability(Apr 2010) Fire-Stop Marketing v Mae Engineering: Construction Contract Dispute over Fire-Rated Board Cladding Payment(May 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Karam S Parmar's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Karam S Parmar's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Econ Piling v Sambo E&C: Scheme of Arrangement & Release of Joint Debtor Liability 21 Apr 2010 Sambo E&C Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff)Won	21 Apr 2010	Sambo E&C Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff): Appeal UpheldSambo E&C was successful in arguing that NCC International remained liable for its joint liabilities.
2	Fire-Stop Marketing v Mae Engineering: Construction Contract Dispute over Fire-Rated Board Cladding Payment 30 May 2004 MAE Engineering Ltd (Defendant)Lost	30 May 2004	MAE Engineering Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim dismissed with costsDefendant's counterclaim dismissed with costs. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.