Kay Pang Ker-Wei

Kay Pang Ker-Wei is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2006. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kay Pang Ker-Wei has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in asset recovery and banking and finance.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Asset Recovery	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kay Pang Ker-Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kay Pang Ker-Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kay Pang Ker-Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kay Pang Ker-Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kay Pang Ker-Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kay Pang Ker-Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kay Pang Ker-Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kay Pang Ker-Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kay Pang Ker-Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kay Pang Ker-Wei has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	1 cases	100% of cases	Kea Meng Kwang v Merrill Lynch: Examination of Witnesses Outside Jurisdiction(Sep 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kay Pang Ker-Wei's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 1 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	15.0 parties avg	5.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kay Pang Ker-Wei's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Kea Meng Kwang v Merrill Lynch: Examination of Witnesses Outside Jurisdiction 11 Sep 2006 Merrill Lynch Investment Managers (Asia Pacific) Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Won	11 Sep 2006	Merrill Lynch Investment Managers (Asia Pacific) Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal WonAppeal dismissed with costs in favour of the defendant.