Kea Meng Kwang v Merrill Lynch: Examination of Witnesses Outside Jurisdiction

In Kea Meng Kwang and Another v Merrill Lynch Investment Managers (Asia Pacific) Ltd and Others, the Singapore High Court addressed an appeal by Kea Meng Kwang against the decision to dismiss his application for a letter of request to examine witnesses in Jersey. Kwang sought the examination of current or former employees of Merrill Lynch Investment Managers (Channel Islands) Limited and RBSI Custody Bank Ltd concerning a guarantee facility and alleged breaches related to an account. The High Court dismissed the appeal, citing concerns over the necessity and cost-effectiveness of obtaining evidence from Jersey, especially given the availability of alternative legal avenues and the potential for the evidence to be obtained through other means.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Appeal dismissed with costs.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Singapore High Court case regarding examination of witnesses in Jersey. The court dismissed the appeal for a letter of request.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Kea Kah KimDefendantIndividualNeutralNeutral
Kea Meng KwangPlaintiff, AppellantIndividualAppeal DismissedLost
PT Siak Raya TimberPlaintiffCorporationAppeal DismissedLost
Merrill Lynch Investment Managers (Asia Pacific) LtdDefendant, RespondentCorporationAppeal WonWon
Kea Meng ChengDefendantIndividualNeutralNeutral

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Woo Bih LiJudgeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. Kwang, Cheng, and Kim are brothers and the account holders.
  2. PT Siak Raya Timber is a company incorporated in Indonesia.
  3. Warburg Asset Management Jersey Ltd was appointed as the investment managers.
  4. SG Warburg & Co (Jersey) Ltd was appointed as the bank for custody and banking services.
  5. MLIM(AP) served as the contact point for the Account Holders.
  6. RBSI issued guarantees to support credit facilities provided by ING Singapore.
  7. Kwang commenced action against MLIM(AP) in respect of the amount debited by RBSI.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Kea Meng Kwang and Another v Merrill Lynch Investment Managers (Asia Pacific) Ltd and Others, Suit 311/2005, [2006] SGHC 161

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Account opened with SG Warburg & Co (Jersey) Ltd.
Agreement signed appointing Warburg Asset Management Jersey Ltd as investment managers.
Account Holders granted a guarantee facility by RBSI.
RBSI issued guarantees to support credit facilities provided by ING Singapore to Kea Properties.
Jeanette Tan nee Ho contacted MLIM(AP) for the Account Holders.
SG Warburg & Co (Jersey) Ltd acquired by the Royal Bank of Scotland and renamed RBSI Custody Bank Ltd.
RBSI issued guarantees to support credit facilities provided by ING Singapore to Kea Properties and Account 5028.
RBSI issued guarantees to support credit facilities provided by ING Singapore to Kea Properties and Account 5028.
Kim requested a guarantee facility from RBSI to secure credit facilities for Kea Properties and Account 5028.
RBSI issued guarantees to secure credit facilities for Kea Properties and Account 5028.
Kwang applied for a letter of request to be issued to the proper judicial authority of Jersey.
Kwang applied to amend the questions which he was seeking answers to.
Assistant registrar dismissed the Summons, as amended.
Judge dismissed Kwang's appeal.
Decision Date

7. Legal Issues

  1. Examination of Witnesses Outside Jurisdiction
    • Outcome: The court dismissed the appeal for a letter of request to examine witnesses in Jersey.
    • Category: Procedural

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Letter of request to the judicial authorities of Jersey for the examination of persons in Jersey

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Mandate
  • Negligence
  • Breach of Fiduciary Duty
  • Dishonest Assistance

10. Practice Areas

  • Litigation

11. Industries

  • Finance

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Ross v WoodfordN/AYes[1894] 1 Ch 38N/ACited regarding difficulties securing witnesses from another country.
Emanuel v SoltykoffN/AYes(1892) 8 TLR 331N/ACited regarding difficulties securing witnesses from another country.
Coch v Allcock & CoN/AYes(1888) 21 QBD 178N/ACited regarding difficulties securing witnesses from another country.
First American Corp v Sheikh Zayed Al-NahyanEnglish Court of AppealYes[1999] 1 WLR 1154EnglandCited regarding the principle of oppressiveness in issuing letters of request.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Order 39 r 2(1) Rules of Court (Cap 322, R 5, 2006 Rev Ed)Singapore
O 39 r 1(1) Rules of Court (Cap 322, R 5, 2006 Rev Ed)Singapore
O 39 r 1(2) Rules of Court (Cap 322, R 5, 2006 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Letter of Request
  • Examination of Witnesses
  • Guarantee Facility
  • Breach of Mandate
  • Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause

15.2 Keywords

  • Letter of request
  • Witnesses
  • Jersey
  • Singapore
  • Civil procedure

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Civil Procedure
  • Evidence
  • Witness Examination