Kelly Fan

Kelly Fan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2007 to 2009. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in agency law and criminal law. Their track record shows a 29.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kelly Fan has demonstrated expertise across 31 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and agency law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Kelly Fan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Kelly Fan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kelly Fan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kelly Fan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kelly Fan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Kelly Fan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Kelly Fan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Kelly Fan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kelly Fan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kelly Fan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kelly Fan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kelly Fan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kelly Fan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Undisclosed Principal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kelly Fan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Tenancy Agreements	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kelly Fan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kelly Fan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Remedial Constructive Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kelly Fan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Express trusts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kelly Fan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Recipient liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kelly Fan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Repudiation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kelly Fan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Domestic Helper Abuse	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kelly Fan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Licence Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kelly Fan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Want of probity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kelly Fan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Investment Management Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Kelly Fan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kelly Fan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kelly Fan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unconscionability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kelly Fan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kelly Fan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kelly Fan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Knowing Receipt	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kelly Fan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kelly Fan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kelly Fan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	6 cases	100% of cases	Public Prosecutor v. Barokah: Sentencing Review After Appeal on Psychiatric Evidence(Feb 2009) Mercurine v Canberra: Setting Aside Default Judgment & Delay in Application(Sep 2008) Family Food Court v Seah Boon Lock: Breach of Contract & Undisclosed Principal(Jul 2008)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kelly Fan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.3 parties avg	2.3	50%
Partial	22.5 parties avg	2.5	33%
Won	23.0 parties avg	3.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2008	32.5 parties avg	2.5
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kelly Fan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(43%)	43%
Partial	2(29%)	29%
Won	2(29%)	29%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
USD	103,043.49	103,043.491 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2008	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v. Barokah: Sentencing Review After Appeal on Psychiatric Evidence 25 Feb 2009 Barokah (Defendant)Lost	25 Feb 2009	Barokah (Defendant): Life ImprisonmentMs. Barokah was sentenced to life imprisonment with effect from the date of her arrest on 19 October 2005.
2	Mercurine v Canberra: Setting Aside Default Judgment & Delay in Application 07 Sep 2008 Canberra Development Pte Ltd (Respondent)Partial	07 Sep 2008	Canberra Development Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal Dismissed in PartAppeal varied; Default Judgment deemed set aside if Mercurine succeeds in Consolidated Suit.
3	Family Food Court v Seah Boon Lock: Breach of Contract & Undisclosed Principal 15 Jul 2008 Wee Lay Teng (Respondent)Won	15 Jul 2008	Wee Lay Teng (Respondent): Judgment UpheldThe High Court's judgment in favor of Wee Lay Teng was upheld.
4	Public Prosecutor v. Barokah: Culpable Homicide, Diminished Responsibility, and Sentencing of Domestic Helper 10 Feb 2008 Barokah (Defendant)Lost	10 Feb 2008	Barokah (Defendant): Life imprisonmentThe accused was sentenced to life imprisonment for culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
5	Seah Boon Lock v Family Food Court: Breach of Licence Agreement & Undisclosed Principal 24 May 2007 Wee Lay Teng trading as Boon Lock Duck and Noodle House (Plaintiff)Won	24 May 2007	Wee Lay Teng trading as Boon Lock Duck and Noodle House (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffDamages to be assessed for FFC’s wrongful repudiation of the Agreement. An account of the total cash collected by FFC from the sales at the Yew Tee Stall for the period 1 March 2005 to 15 April 2005, and the balance sum due to be paid by FFC to Seah in respect of the said period after deduction of the relevant charges under cl 7.7 of the Agreement. Further, payment by FFC to Seah of the balance found due under cl 7.7 of the Agreement in respect of the period 1 March 2005 to 15 April 2005 on taking the above account. Judgment for the sum of $18,000, being refund of the security deposit for the Yew Tee Stall. Judgment for the sum of $30,574.73, being the overcharged licence fees for the use of the Yew Tee Stall for the period February 2004 until February 2005. Damages to be assessed for FFC’s conversion of the plaintiffs’ equipment, goods and effects at the Yew Tee Stall. Interest on the sums under sub-paragraphs (b), (c) and (d) above at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of service of the writ in this action to the date of such payment. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Comboni Vincenzo v Shankar's Emporium: Constructive Trust, Fraudulent Scheme & Recipient Liability 19 Apr 2007 GB & Associates Inc (Plaintiff)Lost	19 Apr 2007	GB & Associates Inc (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedClaims on express trust and constructive trust in knowing receipt at the time of receipt are dismissed. Assumed USD, as the judgment refers to amounts in US dollars.