Public Prosecutor v. Barokah: Culpable Homicide, Diminished Responsibility, and Sentencing of Domestic Helper

In Public Prosecutor v. Barokah, the High Court of Singapore sentenced Barokah, an Indonesian domestic helper, to life imprisonment for culpable homicide not amounting to murder. Barokah pleaded guilty to causing the death of her employer, Wee Keng Wah, by pushing her out of a window. The court considered the defense of diminished responsibility due to Barokah's mental state but ultimately imposed a life sentence, citing the vulnerability of the victim, the breach of trust, and the need to deter violence by domestic workers.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Life imprisonment

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Judgment reserved

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Barokah, an Indonesian domestic helper, was sentenced to life imprisonment for culpable homicide after pushing her employer out of a window. The defense of diminished responsibility was considered.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorProsecutionGovernment AgencyJudgment for the ProsecutionWon
Stella Tan of Deputy Public Prosecutors
Amarjit Singh of Deputy Public Prosecutors
BarokahDefendantIndividualLife imprisonmentLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Tay Yong KwangJudgeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. The accused, an Indonesian domestic helper, pushed her 75-year-old employer out of a ninth-floor window.
  2. The victim was found lying in a pool of blood at the foot of the HDB block.
  3. The accused initially claimed the victim was found on the floor and later went missing.
  4. The accused admitted to a struggle with the victim after being scolded for leaving the flat to meet her boyfriend.
  5. The victim was unconscious and helpless when pushed out the window.
  6. The accused had a history of unstable employment and personal troubles, including infidelity and financial stress.
  7. Psychiatric evaluations revealed the accused suffered from a moderate depressive episode and a possible dependent personality disorder.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Public Prosecutor v Barokah, CC 23/2007, [2008] SGHC 22
  2. PP v Tan Fook Sum, , [1999] 2 SLR 523
  3. PP v Chee Cheong Hin Constance, , [2006] 2 SLR 707
  4. PP v Sundarti Supriyanto, , [2004] 4 SLR 622
  5. PP v Sundarti Supriyanto, , [2004] SGHC 244
  6. Purwanti Parji v PP, , [2005] 2 SLR 220
  7. Neo Man Lee v PP, , [1991] SLR 146
  8. PP v Juminem and another, , [2005] 4 SLR 536
  9. PP v Rohana, , [2006] SGHC 52
  10. PP v Aguilar Guen Garlejo, , [2006] 3 SLR 247
  11. Tan Kay Beng v PP, , [2006] 4 SLR 10

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Accused, Barokah, born.
Accused started working for first family in Singapore.
Accused stopped working for first family in Singapore.
Accused went to Malaysia to work as a domestic helper.
Accused returned to Singapore to work for second family.
Accused sent to work for a third employer.
Accused started working for Wee Keng Wah.
Wee Keng Wah found dead; the alleged crime occurred.
Accused arrested.
Accused sent for psychiatric evaluation.
Accused gave birth to a baby girl while in remand.
Defence counsel engaged psychiatrist to examine the accused.
Dr Tommy Tan issued supplemental report.
Dr Nagulendran issued further report.
Judgment reserved.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder
    • Outcome: The court found the accused guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Diminished Responsibility
      • Intention to cause death
    • Related Cases:
      • [2004] 4 SLR 622
      • [2004] SGHC 244
      • [2005] 2 SLR 220
      • [2005] 4 SLR 536
      • [2006] SGHC 52
      • [2006] 3 SLR 247
  2. Diminished Responsibility
    • Outcome: The court acknowledged the accused's mental condition but determined it did not negate her ability to distinguish between right and wrong.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Severe Reactive Depression
      • Moderate Depressive Episode
      • Abnormality of Mind
      • Impaired Mental Responsibility
  3. Sentencing
    • Outcome: The court sentenced the accused to life imprisonment, emphasizing the need for deterrence and the protection of vulnerable individuals.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Deterrence
      • Rehabilitation
      • Public Interest
      • Vulnerability of Victim
      • Employer-Domestic Worker Relationship
    • Related Cases:
      • [1999] 2 SLR 523
      • [2006] 2 SLR 707
      • [2005] 2 SLR 220
      • [2006] 4 SLR 10

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Imprisonment

9. Cause of Actions

  • Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Law
  • Homicide

11. Industries

  • Domestic Services

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
PP v Tan Fook SumHigh CourtYes[1999] 2 SLR 523SingaporeCited regarding the court's discretion to consider a deterrent sentence without a specific application from the prosecution.
PP v Chee Cheong Hin ConstanceHigh CourtYes[2006] 2 SLR 707SingaporeCited regarding the burden on the prosecution to establish that the accused is likely to remain a future and real danger to the public without medication and permanent incarceration.
PP v Sundarti SupriyantoHigh CourtYes[2004] 4 SLR 622SingaporeCited as a case where a domestic helper was convicted of culpable homicide after the defense showed grave and sudden provocation, resulting in a life imprisonment sentence.
PP v Sundarti SupriyantoHigh CourtYes[2004] SGHC 244SingaporeCited as a case where a domestic helper was convicted of culpable homicide after the defense showed grave and sudden provocation, resulting in a life imprisonment sentence.
Purwanti Parji v PPCourt of AppealYes[2005] 2 SLR 220SingaporeCited as a case where the Court of Appeal upheld a life imprisonment sentence for a domestic helper who strangled her employer's mother-in-law, emphasizing the need to protect vulnerable individuals and deter violence by domestic workers.
Neo Man Lee v PPCourt of Criminal AppealYes[1991] SLR 146SingaporeCited for endorsing the Hodgson conditions for imposing a life imprisonment sentence.
R v HodgsonEnglish Court of AppealYes52 Cr App R 113England and WalesCited for laying down conditions that would justify imposing a sentence of life imprisonment.
PP v Juminem and anotherHigh CourtYes[2005] 4 SLR 536SingaporeCited as a case involving Indonesian domestic helpers convicted of culpable homicide with diminished responsibility, resulting in life and ten-year imprisonment sentences.
PP v RohanaHigh CourtYes[2006] SGHC 52SingaporeCited as a case where a domestic helper was sentenced to ten years imprisonment for culpable homicide, with the court considering the absence of premeditation and the history of abuse suffered by the accused.
PP v Aguilar Guen GarlejoHigh CourtYes[2006] 3 SLR 247SingaporeCited as a case where a domestic helper was sentenced to ten years imprisonment for culpable homicide, with the court considering the accused's mental state and the improbability of re-offending.
Tan Kay Beng v PPHigh CourtYes[2006] 4 SLR 10SingaporeCited regarding the need for clear articulation of reasons for invoking deterrence in sentencing.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
section 304(a) of the Penal Code (Cap 224, 1985 Ed)Singapore
s 231(a) of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68, 1985 Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Culpable Homicide
  • Diminished Responsibility
  • Domestic Helper
  • Life Imprisonment
  • Depressive Episode
  • Employer-Domestic Worker Relationship
  • Vulnerable Victim
  • Deterrence
  • Transient Mental Abnormality
  • Dependent Personality Disorder

15.2 Keywords

  • culpable homicide
  • diminished responsibility
  • domestic helper
  • life imprisonment
  • Singapore
  • Penal Code
  • mental disorder

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Sentencing
  • Mental Health