Kelvin Kow

Kelvin Kow is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal procedure and criminal revision. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kelvin Kow has demonstrated expertise across 16 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal procedure and employment law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Procedure	3 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Kelvin Kow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Kelvin Kow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kelvin Kow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kelvin Kow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kelvin Kow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kelvin Kow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Money Laundering	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kelvin Kow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating course of justice	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kelvin Kow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kelvin Kow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Retraction of Plea	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kelvin Kow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Mitigation Plea	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kelvin Kow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Offences	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kelvin Kow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kelvin Kow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kelvin Kow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kelvin Kow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kelvin Kow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kelvin Kow has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	4 cases	100% of cases	PP v Dinesh: Interpreting s 228(4) CPC on Guilty Pleas & Mitigation(Apr 2019) Dinesh s/o Rajantheran v Public Prosecutor: Retraction of Guilty Plea and Section 228(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code(Nov 2018) Li Huabo v Public Prosecutor: Appeal on Dishonestly Receiving Stolen Property under s 411 Penal Code(Jul 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kelvin Kow's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Partial	18.0 parties avg	8.0	25%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	18.0 parties avg	8.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kelvin Kow's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Dinesh: Interpreting s 228(4) CPC on Guilty Pleas & Mitigation 22 Apr 2019 Public Prosecutor (Applicant)Lost	22 Apr 2019	Public Prosecutor (Applicant): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor's appeal was dismissed.
2	Dinesh s/o Rajantheran v Public Prosecutor: Retraction of Guilty Plea and Section 228(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code 22 Nov 2018 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	22 Nov 2018	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe applicant's criminal revision was allowed, and the conviction was set aside.
3	Li Huabo v Public Prosecutor: Appeal on Dishonestly Receiving Stolen Property under s 411 Penal Code 09 Jul 2014 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	09 Jul 2014	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Conviction UpheldThe conviction of the appellant for dishonestly receiving stolen property was upheld.
4	Seah Hock Thiam v Public Prosecutor: Abetting Perversion of Justice for Parking Offences 18 Jul 2013 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	18 Jul 2013	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal against conviction upheld; appeal against sentence partially overturnedAppeal against conviction upheld. Appeal against sentence partially overturned, with the imprisonment term reduced from six weeks to one week (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).