Kenneth Choo

Kenneth Choo is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in judgments and orders and property law. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kenneth Choo has demonstrated expertise across 30 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Kenneth Choo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Kenneth Choo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kenneth Choo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Kenneth Choo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kenneth Choo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Mistake	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Kenneth Choo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kenneth Choo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kenneth Choo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kenneth Choo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kenneth Choo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kenneth Choo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unconscionability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kenneth Choo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Choo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kenneth Choo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kenneth Choo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kenneth Choo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kenneth Choo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Strata Titles	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kenneth Choo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Choo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kenneth Choo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kenneth Choo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sham Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Choo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insurance Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kenneth Choo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kenneth Choo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Liquidation of foreign company	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kenneth Choo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kenneth Choo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kenneth Choo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kenneth Choo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kenneth Choo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Choo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kenneth Choo has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Shook Lin and Bok	4 cases	50% of cases	RBG Resources plc v Credit Lyonnais: Foreign Company Liquidation & Creditor's Debt Claim(Oct 2005) Wisanggeni Lauw v Full Fledge Holdings: Breach of Contract & Share Transfer Dispute(Apr 2005) Full Fledge Holdings Ltd v Wisanggeni Lauw: Dispute over Judgment Terms & Amendment to Statement of Claim(Sep 2004)
Shook Lin & Bok LLP	3 cases	38% of cases	Law Society of Singapore v Jasmine Gowrimani: Disciplinary Tribunal Discretion & Legal Profession Act Interpretation(May 2010) Gammon v JBE Properties: Injunction Against Performance Bond Call Due to Unconscionability(Apr 2010) Pender Development v Chesney Real Estate: Loan, Insurance Bond & Misrepresentation Dispute(May 2009)
Shook Lin & Bok	1 cases	13% of cases	Management Corporation v Hyundai: Strata Titles, Common Property & Window Rectification(May 2007)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kenneth Choo's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.1
Complex Cases: 2 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	13%
Lost	24.3 parties avg	4.3	25%
Partial	22.5 parties avg	2.5	25%
Unknown	14.0 parties avg	4.0	13%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2007	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2009	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2010	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kenneth Choo's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(13%)	13%
Lost	2(25%)	25%
Partial	2(25%)	25%
Unknown	1(13%)	13%
Won	2(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	8,289,000.00	1,657,800.005 cases	5
USD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2005	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 11	Unknown: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Law Society of Singapore v Jasmine Gowrimani: Disciplinary Tribunal Discretion & Legal Profession Act Interpretation 06 May 2010 Jasmine Gowrimani d/o Daniel (Respondent)Won	06 May 2010	Jasmine Gowrimani d/o Daniel (Respondent): Application DismissedThe Law Society's application was dismissed, and no order was made as to costs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Gammon v JBE Properties: Injunction Against Performance Bond Call Due to Unconscionability 27 Apr 2010 BNP Paribas Singapore Branch (Other)	27 Apr 2010	BNP Paribas Singapore Branch (Other): -
3	Pender Development v Chesney Real Estate: Loan, Insurance Bond & Misrepresentation Dispute 25 May 2009 Bravo Building Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant)Lost	25 May 2009	Bravo Building Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for Chesney Real Estate Group LLP against Bravo Building Construction Pte Ltd for $8,284,000.00 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Management Corporation v Hyundai: Strata Titles, Common Property & Window Rectification 10 May 2007 Hyundai Engineering & Construction Co Ltd (Defendant)Lost	10 May 2007	Hyundai Engineering & Construction Co Ltd (Defendant): Declaration AgainstDeclaration made against the defendant that the management corporation had a duty to maintain the windows until 1 April 2005 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	RBG Resources plc v Credit Lyonnais: Foreign Company Liquidation & Creditor's Debt Claim 27 Oct 2005 West LB (Respondent)Partial	27 Oct 2005	West LB (Respondent): Application granted in partPayment Application granted, Transmission Application adjourned.
6	Wisanggeni Lauw v Full Fledge Holdings: Breach of Contract & Share Transfer Dispute 10 Apr 2005 Full Fledge Holdings Ltd (Respondent, Appellant, Plaintiff)Won	10 Apr 2005	Full Fledge Holdings Ltd (Respondent, Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal AllowedFull Fledge's appeal in CA 95/2004 was allowed with costs. The security for costs, together with any accrued interest, shall be refunded to Full Fledge. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
7	Full Fledge Holdings Ltd v Wisanggeni Lauw: Dispute over Judgment Terms & Amendment to Statement of Claim 19 Sep 2004 Full Fledge Holdings Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	19 Sep 2004	Full Fledge Holdings Ltd (Plaintiff): Amendment to Statement of Claim to be incorporatedPlaintiff directed to incorporate the amendment into the Statement of Claim, which should then be reflected in the judgment.
8	Hyundai Engineering v Rankine and Hill: Negligence Claim over Piping Material Cost Calculation 15 Aug 2004 Hyundai Engineering and Construction Co Ltd (Plaintiff)Dismissed	15 Aug 2004	Hyundai Engineering and Construction Co Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's action was effectively dismissed, with costs of $5,000 plus reasonable disbursements awarded to the defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).