Kenneth Koh

Kenneth Koh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and banking law. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kenneth Koh has demonstrated expertise across 16 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Kenneth Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kenneth Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kenneth Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kenneth Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kenneth Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Forgery	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kenneth Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kenneth Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kenneth Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kenneth Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kenneth Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Cheques	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kenneth Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kenneth Koh has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
UniLegal LLC	2 cases	50% of cases	Helukabel Singapore v Ng Tuck Chuan: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Wrongful Dismissal(Dec 2008) Mero Asia Pacific v Takenaka Corp: Review of Taxation of Costs for Adjourned Arbitration Hearing(Sep 2002)
Davinder Singh Chambers LLC	1 cases	25% of cases	Lin Jianwei v Tung Yu-Lien Margaret: Application for Leave to Appeal Decision on Reimbursement of Legal Fees(Oct 2020)
Kenneth Koh & Co	1 cases	25% of cases	Khoo Tian Hock v Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp: Forged Cheques & Bank's Duty(Aug 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kenneth Koh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	25%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Won	22.5 parties avg	2.5	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kenneth Koh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	339,431.78	169,715.892 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lin Jianwei v Tung Yu-Lien Margaret: Application for Leave to Appeal Decision on Reimbursement of Legal Fees 25 Oct 2020 Tung Yu-Lien Margaret (Defendant)Won	25 Oct 2020	Tung Yu-Lien Margaret (Defendant): Application grantedThe application to dismiss the plaintiff's application was granted. No monetary amount was specified. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Helukabel Singapore v Ng Tuck Chuan: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Wrongful Dismissal 11 Dec 2008 Helukabel Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	11 Dec 2008	Helukabel Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment in favour of Helukabel Singapore Pte Ltd against Ng Tuck Chuan for $339,431.78 with interest (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Mero Asia Pacific v Takenaka Corp: Review of Taxation of Costs for Adjourned Arbitration Hearing 29 Sep 2002 Takenaka Corp (Respondent)Partial	29 Sep 2002	Takenaka Corp (Respondent): Application allowed in partApplication for review of taxation of costs was allowed in part, resulting in a reduction of costs awarded to the claimant.
4	Khoo Tian Hock v Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp: Forged Cheques & Bank's Duty 31 Aug 2000 Khoo Tian Hock (Plaintiff)Lost	31 Aug 2000	Khoo Tian Hock (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim against the defendant was dismissed.