Kenneth Lie

Kenneth Lie is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2006. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and metal commodities trading. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kenneth Lie has demonstrated expertise across 18 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil practice and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Practice	4 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Kenneth Lie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	4 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Kenneth Lie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Kenneth Lie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Kenneth Lie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Kenneth Lie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Lie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kenneth Lie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kenneth Lie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kenneth Lie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Business Formation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kenneth Lie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Lie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Metal Commodities Trading	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kenneth Lie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Kenneth Lie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Interpleader Relief	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Kenneth Lie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kenneth Lie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kenneth Lie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Lie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kenneth Lie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kenneth Lie has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Joseph Tan Jude Benny	4 cases	80% of cases	Banque Cantonale Vaudoise v Fujitrans: Discovery Application & Issue Estoppel(Nov 2006) Melati: Discontinuance Without Leave & Extension of Time for Statement of Claim(Jun 2004) The "Melati" (No 2): Appeal on Extension of Time to File Statement of Claim(Apr 2004)
Joseph Tan Jude and Benny	1 cases	20% of cases	Banque Cantonale Vaudoise v RBG Resources: Discovery of Documents and Summary Judgment Appeal(Sep 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kenneth Lie's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.6
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	44.0 parties avg	4.0	80%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	19.0 parties avg	9.0
2004	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kenneth Lie's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(80%)	80%
Won	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Banque Cantonale Vaudoise v Fujitrans: Discovery Application & Issue Estoppel 28 Nov 2006 Fujitrans (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	28 Nov 2006	Fujitrans (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Banque Cantonale Vaudoise v RBG Resources: Discovery of Documents and Summary Judgment Appeal 29 Sep 2004 Fujitrans (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	29 Sep 2004	Fujitrans (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal dismissedFujitrans' appeal against the decision to dismiss its discovery application was dismissed with costs. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
3	Melati: Discontinuance Without Leave & Extension of Time for Statement of Claim 27 Jun 2004 Shipowners (Defendant, Appellant)Won	27 Jun 2004	Shipowners (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	The "Melati" (No 2): Appeal on Extension of Time to File Statement of Claim 14 Apr 2004 Cargo owners (Respondent)Lost	14 Apr 2004	Cargo owners (Respondent): Appeal was properly broughtThe court held that the appeal was properly brought because the orders of Ang J were interlocutory orders and the shipowners complied with s 34(1)(c) of the SCJA.
5	Banque Cantonale Vaudoise v RBG Resources: Stay of Proceedings for Non-Existent Metal Cargoes 06 Nov 2002 Fujitrans (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Applicant)Lost	06 Nov 2002	Fujitrans (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Applicant): Application for stay of proceedings dismissedFujitrans' application for a stay of proceedings regarding the Schedule 3 claim was dismissed.