Banque Cantonale Vaudoise v Fujitrans: Discovery Application & Issue Estoppel
Banque Cantonale Vaudoise (BCV) sued Fujitrans (Singapore) Pte Ltd for an alleged fraudulent scheme. Fujitrans appealed against the dismissal of their application for discovery of documents. The High Court dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the Assistant Registrar that the application was an attempt to re-open issues already decided in a prior application and constituted a fishing expedition. The court found that Fujitrans had not demonstrated a substantial change in circumstances to warrant a different view.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court1.2 Outcome
Appeal Dismissed
1.3 Case Type
Civil
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Appeal regarding discovery of documents. The court affirmed the dismissal of the application, citing issue estoppel and a fishing expedition.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Banque Cantonale Vaudoise | Plaintiff, Respondent | Corporation | Appeal Dismissed | Won | |
Fujitrans (Singapore) Pte Ltd | Defendant, Appellant | Corporation | Appeal Dismissed | Lost |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Tan Lee Meng | Judge | Yes |
4. Counsels
4. Facts
- BCV sued Fujitrans for an alleged fraudulent scheme perpetrated by RBG Resources Plc.
- BCV claimed Fujitrans sent fraudulent warehouse attornments for non-existent cargoes.
- BCV asserted it would not have disbursed monies to RBG’s seller if it had known the attornments were false.
- Fujitrans' former warehouse manager, Mr Lim Tau Hee, was allegedly involved in the fraud.
- Fujitrans sought discovery of seven categories of documents, six of which had been considered in a prior application.
- The first discovery application was dismissed as a fishing expedition or attempt to discover irrelevant documents.
- BCV's claim was limited to attornments in relation to non-existent goods.
5. Formal Citations
- Banque Cantonale Vaudoise v Fujitrans (Singapore) Pte Ltd, Suit 542/2002, RA 260/2006, [2006] SGHC 217
- Banque Cantonale Vaudoise v RBG Resources Plc, , [2004] 4 SLR 856
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
First discovery application dismissed by the Assistant Registrar save for one category. | |
Plaintiff’s Re-Re-Amended Statement of Claim dated | |
Fujitrans’ second discovery application heard | |
Appeal dismissed |
7. Legal Issues
- Discovery of Documents
- Outcome: The court held that the appellant's application for discovery of documents was a fishing expedition and that the documents sought were not relevant to the appellant's defences.
- Category: Procedural
- Sub-Issues:
- Relevance of documents
- Fishing expedition
- Issue Estoppel
- Outcome: The court found that the issue of discovery had already been decided in a prior application, and that the appellant had not demonstrated a substantial change in circumstances to warrant a different view.
- Category: Procedural
8. Remedies Sought
- Monetary Damages
9. Cause of Actions
- Negligence
- Vicarious Liability
10. Practice Areas
- Commercial Litigation
11. Industries
- Banking
- Warehousing
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Banque Cantonale Vaudoise v RBG Resources Plc | High Court | Yes | [2004] 4 SLR 856 | Singapore | The court relied on this case, which involved the first discovery application, to determine that the second discovery application was an attempt to re-open issues already decided. |
O Co v M Co | N/A | Yes | [1996] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 347 | England | Cited for the principle that discovery should not be a 'fishing expedition'. |
Tan Chin Seng & Ors v Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2002] 3 SLR 345 | Singapore | Cited for the essential preconditions to be satisfied before discovery will be ordered is that of relevance. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
Order 24 rule 5 Rules of Court | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Discovery of documents
- Fishing expedition
- Issue estoppel
- Warehouse attornments
- Fraudulent scheme
- Warehouse financing
15.2 Keywords
- Discovery
- Documents
- Issue Estoppel
- Fraud
- Banking
- Singapore
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Civil Practice | 75 |
Evidence | 60 |
Commercial Disputes | 50 |
Fraud and Deceit | 40 |
Contract Law | 30 |
Estoppel | 25 |
Company Law | 20 |
16. Subjects
- Civil Procedure
- Banking Law