Kenny Lau Hui Ming

Kenny Lau Hui Ming is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and jurisdiction. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kenny Lau Hui Ming has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil practice and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Practice	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kenny Lau Hui Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Kenny Lau Hui Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Kenny Lau Hui Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenny Lau Hui Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenny Lau Hui Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kenny Lau Hui Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kenny Lau Hui Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kenny Lau Hui Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenny Lau Hui Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenny Lau Hui Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kenny Lau Hui Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kenny Lau Hui Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Duty of full and frank disclosure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenny Lau Hui Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Loans of money	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenny Lau Hui Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Court Order	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kenny Lau Hui Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Legal Professional Privilege	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenny Lau Hui Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kenny Lau Hui Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Share of Profit	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kenny Lau Hui Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Kenny Lau Hui Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kenny Lau Hui Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kenny Lau Hui Ming has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Providence Law Asia LLC	2 cases	67% of cases	Kernel Oil Pte Ltd v Iman Djuniardi: Dispute over Loan Agreements & Forum Non Conveniens(Mar 2020) Griffin Real Estate v. ERC Unicampus: Account of Profits for Big Hotel Sale(Oct 2019)
WongPartnership LLP	1 cases	33% of cases	EQ Capital Investments Ltd v Sunbreeze Group: Minority Oppression & Marital Privilege(Sep 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kenny Lau Hui Ming's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	24.4 parties avg	4.4	67%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kenny Lau Hui Ming's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	2(67%)	67%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Kernel Oil Pte Ltd v Iman Djuniardi: Dispute over Loan Agreements & Forum Non Conveniens 22 Mar 2020 Iman Djuniardi (Defendant, Respondent)Won	22 Mar 2020	Iman Djuniardi (Defendant, Respondent): Application to set aside Leave Order grantedApplication to set aside the Leave Order and service of the writ of summons and statement of claim granted. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Griffin Real Estate v. ERC Unicampus: Account of Profits for Big Hotel Sale 23 Oct 2019 Griffin Real Estate Investment Holdings Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Appellant, Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	23 Oct 2019	Griffin Real Estate Investment Holdings Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Appellant, Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal Allowed in PartThe court allowed the appeal in part by modifying the formula for computing the net profit. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
3	EQ Capital Investments Ltd v Sunbreeze Group: Minority Oppression & Marital Privilege 18 Sep 2017 The Wellness Group Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	18 Sep 2017	The Wellness Group Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application for specific discovery denied in partApplication for specific discovery denied in part.