Kernel Oil Pte Ltd v Iman Djuniardi: Dispute over Loan Agreements & Forum Non Conveniens

Kernel Oil Pte Ltd sued Iman Djuniardi in the High Court of Singapore for unpaid principal sums, late payment charges, and default annual interest under several loan agreements. The defendant applied to set aside the court order granting leave for the plaintiff to serve the writ of summons and statement of claim in Switzerland. The court dismissed the plaintiff's appeal, finding that Singapore was not the proper forum to hear the dispute and that the plaintiff had failed to make full and frank disclosure of material facts.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court of the Republic of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Appeal Dismissed

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Singapore court dismisses appeal, finding Switzerland the proper forum for a dispute over loan agreements between Kernel Oil and Iman Djuniardi.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Kernel Oil Pte LtdPlaintiff, AppellantCorporationAppeal DismissedLostTang Shangwei, Rachel Lee Pei Hua
Iman DjuniardiDefendant, RespondentIndividualApplication to set aside Leave Order grantedWonKenny Lau Hui Ming

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Choo Han TeckJudgeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Tang ShangweiWongPartnership LLP
Rachel Lee Pei HuaWongPartnership LLP
Kenny Lau Hui MingProvidence Law Asia LLC

4. Facts

  1. The plaintiff, Kernel Oil Pte Ltd, is a Singapore-incorporated company engaged in the wholesale of petrochemical products and the trading of crude oil.
  2. The defendant, Iman Djuniardi, is an Indonesian national resident in Switzerland, described as a trader of crude oil and other oil products.
  3. The plaintiff sued the defendant for unpaid principal sums, late payment charges, and default annual interest under several loan agreements.
  4. The Loan Agreements did not expressly state what the governing law was.
  5. The Loan Agreements were denominated in Swiss francs, and the loan monies were disbursed in Swiss francs.
  6. The commercial purpose of the transaction was to set up a Swiss entity, KOSA, and to provide its initial working capital.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Kernel Oil Pte Ltd v Iman Djuniardi, Suit No 281 of 2019, [2020] SGHC 52

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Suit No 281 of 2019 filed
Registrar’s Appeal No 263 of 2019 filed
Summons No 5712 of 2019 filed
Hearing date
Hearing date
Hearing date
Judgment reserved

7. Legal Issues

  1. Forum Non Conveniens
    • Outcome: The court found that Singapore was not the proper forum to hear the dispute, as Swiss law governed the Loan Agreements.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Related Cases:
      • [2014] 4 SLR 500
      • [2016] 5 SLR 1322
      • [2008] 2 SLR(R) 491
      • [1996] 2 SLR(R) 589
  2. Full and Frank Disclosure
    • Outcome: The court found that the plaintiff failed to make full and frank disclosure of material facts in its original leave application.
    • Category: Procedural
  3. Governing Law of Contract
    • Outcome: The court determined that Swiss law governed the Loan Agreements.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • [2008] 2 SLR(R) 491

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Unpaid principal sums
  2. Late payment charges
  3. Default annual interest

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Contract

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation

11. Industries

  • Petrochemical
  • Commodities Trading

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Zoom Communications Ltd v Broadcast Solutions Pte LtdCourt of AppealYes[2014] 4 SLR 500SingaporeCited for the three conditions to be satisfied for setting aside a leave order.
Humpuss Sea Transport Pte Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) v PT Humpuss Intermoda Transportasi TBK and anotherUnknownYes[2016] 5 SLR 1322SingaporeCited for the principle that the law governing the contract is an important consideration in deciding the proper forum.
Pacific Recreation Pte Ltd v S Y Technology Inc and another appealCourt of AppealYes[2008] 2 SLR(R) 491SingaporeCited for the issues to consider when the governing law is not expressly stated in the contract.
Overseas Union Insurance Ltd v Turegum Insurance CoUnknownYes[2001] 2 SLR(R) 285SingaporeCited regarding the location of risks of a contract pointing towards the governing law.
Las Vegas Hilton Corp (trading as Las Vegas Hilton) v Khoo Teng Hock SunnyUnknownYes[1996] 2 SLR(R) 589SingaporeCited for the commercial purpose of the transaction as a factor in determining governing law.
John Reginald Stott Kirkham and others v Trane US Inc and othersUnknownYes[2009] 4 SLR(R) 428SingaporeCited regarding the ease of transporting documents overseas.
Bradley Lomas Electrolok Ltd and another v Colt Ventilation East Asia and othersUnknownYes[1999] 3 SLR(R) 1156SingaporeCited regarding jurisdictional grounds in O 11 r 1 of the ROC.
IM Skaugen SE and another v MAN Diesel & Turbo SE and anotherHigh CourtYes[2018] SGHC 123SingaporeCited regarding jurisdictional grounds in O 11 r 1 of the ROC.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
O 11 r 1 of the Rules of Court
O 11 r 1(d)(i) of the Rules of Court

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Rules of Court (Cap 322, R 5, 2014 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Loan Agreements
  • Governing Law
  • Proper Forum
  • Full and Frank Disclosure
  • Swiss Francs
  • KOSA (Kernel Oil (Suisse) SA)

15.2 Keywords

  • Loan Agreement
  • Singapore
  • Switzerland
  • Jurisdiction
  • Forum
  • Service out of jurisdiction

16. Subjects

  • Civil Procedure
  • Contract Law
  • Conflict of Laws
  • Forum Non Conveniens

17. Areas of Law

  • Civil Procedure
  • Contract Law
  • Conflict of Laws