Kevin Lim

Kevin Lim is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in employment law and workers compensation. Their track record shows a 43.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 29% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kevin Lim has demonstrated expertise across 33 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and employment law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Kevin Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Kevin Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kevin Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Kevin Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Kevin Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kevin Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Kevin Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Workers Compensation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kevin Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kevin Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kevin Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kevin Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kevin Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kevin Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kevin Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kevin Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kevin Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kevin Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kevin Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kevin Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kevin Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Dismissal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kevin Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Equitable Execution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kevin Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Locus Standi	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kevin Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Kevin Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Redundancy Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kevin Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Confidentiality Obligation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kevin Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Options Trading	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kevin Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kevin Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kevin Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Consumer Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kevin Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kevin Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kevin Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kevin Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kevin Lim has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	2 cases	29% of cases	Pang Chen Suan v Commissioner for Labour: Workmen's Compensation & Limitation Period(May 2008) Pang Chen Suan v Commissioner for Labour: Judicial Review of Workmen's Compensation Claim Refusal(Aug 2007)
Wee Swee Teow & Co	2 cases	29% of cases	Tan Holdings v Prosperity Steel: Receivership, Bonus Shares & Locus Standi(Sep 2011) Cousins v Royal Bank of Scotland: Redundancy Agreement & Confidentiality Breach(Mar 2010)
Harry Elias Partnership LLP	1 cases	14% of cases	Tan Eck Hong v Maxz Universal: Minority Shareholder Oppression & Director's Duties(Nov 2017)
Goodwins Law Corporation	1 cases	14% of cases	Freely Pte Ltd v Ong Kaili: Misleading Conduct & Consumer Protection(Feb 2010)
Deputy Public Prosecutor	1 cases	14% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Sudarsanan Margasagayam: Rape Charges & Witness Credibility(Sep 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kevin Lim's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.6
Complex Cases: 2 (29%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	44.0 parties avg	4.0	57%
Won	33.0 parties avg	3.0	43%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2011	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2017	19.0 parties avg	9.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kevin Lim's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(57%)	57%
Won	3(43%)	43%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	455,085.39	113,771.354 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Tan Eck Hong v Maxz Universal: Minority Shareholder Oppression & Director's Duties 30 Nov 2017 Tan Boon Kian (Defendant)Lost	30 Nov 2017	Tan Boon Kian (Defendant): Shares to be purchasedThe court ordered Maxz Universal and Rodney Tan to purchase Tan Eck Hong's shares at a fair value, adjusted for the oppressive actions. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Tan Holdings v Prosperity Steel: Receivership, Bonus Shares & Locus Standi 29 Sep 2011 Prosperity Steel (Asia) Co Ltd (Defendant)Won	29 Sep 2011	Prosperity Steel (Asia) Co Ltd (Defendant): Application DismissedApplication against Prosperity Steel dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Cousins v Royal Bank of Scotland: Redundancy Agreement & Confidentiality Breach 09 Mar 2010 Cousins Scott William (Plaintiff)Won	09 Mar 2010	Cousins Scott William (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffPlaintiff's claim for $455,085.39 allowed with interest. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Freely Pte Ltd v Ong Kaili: Misleading Conduct & Consumer Protection 18 Feb 2010 Freely Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	18 Feb 2010	Freely Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Freely Pte Ltd was ordered to pay the claimants damages as determined by the Small Claims Tribunal. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Pang Chen Suan v Commissioner for Labour: Workmen's Compensation & Limitation Period 27 May 2008 Commissioner for Labour (Respondent)Lost	27 May 2008	Commissioner for Labour (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Pang Chen Suan v Commissioner for Labour: Judicial Review of Workmen's Compensation Claim Refusal 29 Aug 2007 Commissioner for Labour (Respondent)Won	29 Aug 2007	Commissioner for Labour (Respondent): Decision upheldThe Commissioner for Labour's decision to reject the late claim was upheld.
7	Public Prosecutor v Sudarsanan Margasagayam: Rape Charges & Witness Credibility 24 Sep 2006 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Lost	24 Sep 2006	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Charges dismissedThe Public Prosecutor's case was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt, leading to the dismissal of all charges.